Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Economics

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Economics

Best-practice technology in an adverse environment: the case of Indian sugar, 1981-1986

Article Abstract:

The concepts of best-practice technology and technological regress are re-examined in the adverse environment of Indian sugar industry from 1981 to 1986. When the industry faced difficulty in transforming inputs into outputs at the normal rate, the observed level of best-practice technology deteriorated, as seen in the decline of the production frontier of the industry. Such technological regress is different from a reduction in efficiency because it also has an impact on the most efficient firms. In fact, the observed efficiency level of the inefficient firms may become better during adversity because of the most efficient firms' 'regress.'

Author: Ferrantino, Michael J., Ferrier, Gary D.
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Subject: Economics
ISSN: 0167-2681
Year: 1996
Sugar Crops, Other Crop Farming, Sugarcane and sugar beets, Production management, Sugar industry

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Product and process flexibility in an innovative environment

Article Abstract:

Innovations can either be demand-enhancing or cost-reducing. These two dimensions complement each other in terms of increasing the short-term net revenue of a firm. The complementarities between the firm's short-run decision variables then result in complementarities between its long-run decisions about product and process flexibility and research capabilities. This was gleaned from an examination of a number of attributes of a firm's long-run decisions about organizational structure, which affect the firm's short-run innovations.

Author: Athey, Susan, Schmutzler, Armin
Publisher: Rand, Journal of Economics
Publication Name: RAND Journal of Economics
Subject: Economics
ISSN: 0741-6261
Year: 1995
Organizational change

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Protecting the environment when costs and benefits are privately known

Article Abstract:

Approaches for protecting the environment when costs and benefits of pollution reduction is known were examined. Environmental economists recommend a polluter pay principle by establishing markets for the trade pollution permits or the levying of pollution taxes. Thus, decisions to reduce pollution are delegated to individuals who are best informed of their options.

Author: Lewis, Tracy R.
Publisher: Rand, Journal of Economics
Publication Name: RAND Journal of Economics
Subject: Economics
ISSN: 0741-6261
Year: 1996
Waste Management and Remediation Services, Pollution Control, Sanitary Services, Analysis, Economic aspects, Pollution control industry, Pollution

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Research, Technological innovations
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Pricing and access under national competition policy: the case of the natural gas pipeline sector. Fiscal policy in Australia and Southeast Asia: an overview
  • Abstracts: Transaction costs and partnerships: the case of the rock bands. Transaction costs, technology transfer, and in-house R&D: a study of the Indian private corporate sector
  • Abstracts: On the structural stability of trade equations: the case of Japan. Measurement of the unexpected US trade deficit
  • Abstracts: An empirical analysis of the changing role of the German Bundesbank after 1983. part 2 Privatisation and efficiency in the UK water industry: an empirical analysis
  • Abstracts: Location choice as a signal for product quality: the economics of 'made in Germany.' Informed courts, uninformed individuals, and the economics of judicial hindsight
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.