Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Health

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Health

Beware: hocus-pocus ergonomics

Article Abstract:

Companies should avoid implementing short-term solutions to ergonomic problems. These ineffective solutions include exercise programs, vitamin B-6 doses, job rotation programs and surgery. San Francisco, CA, has passed a law to reduce video-display-terminal (VDT) risks. At the same time, the Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) and American National Standards Institute (ANSI) have been trying to improve standards on cumulative trauma disorders (CTD). In following the ergonomics laws and standards, companies can have a better understanding of employee problems and can improve their productivity.

Author: Castelli, Jim
Publisher: National Safety Council
Publication Name: Safety & Health
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0891-1797
Year: 1992
Cover Story, American National Standards Institute, Ergonomics, San Francisco, California, Video monitors

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


What's the state of state OSHA plans? OSHA and Congress take a closer look at state plans

Article Abstract:

The Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) allowed states to establish their own safety-and-health plans in 1970, provided they would be comparable to OSHA standards. The 23 state-plan states were evaluated on 36 performance measures, in line with clamors for OSHA reforms and issues raised regarding state plans, and each was found to have at least one defect. State officials contested the validity of the study and argued that while OSHA imposes more severe penalties on violators, state-plan states conduct more inspections.

Author: Castelli, Jim
Publisher: National Safety Council
Publication Name: Safety & Health
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0891-1797
Year: 1992
Occupational health and safety, Occupational safety and health

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Regulations get a red light

Article Abstract:

Pres George Bush imposed a three-month moratorium on new federal regulations on Jan 21, 1992 to allow government to identify and abolish regulations inimical to economic development. The government argued the decision would result in savings of $10-$20 billion for businesses in 1992. However, the moratorium caused the derailment of significant safety-and-health regulations that would have prevented hundred of deaths and injuries.

Author: Castelli, Jim
Publisher: National Safety Council
Publication Name: Safety & Health
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0891-1797
Year: 1992
Business associations, Health aspects, Analysis, Political activity, Industrial policy, Industry regulations, Government regulation of business, Trade regulation, National Association of Manufacturers

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Standards, Laws, regulations and rules, United States. Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Extracorporeal photopheresis in the treatment of AIDS-related complex: a pilot study. Photopheresis and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection: the Annals views preliminary reports
  • Abstracts: How early is early? Experts debate when and how to start HIV treatment. Citing loss of underground DDC, AIDS activists urge more access
  • Abstracts: A controlled trial of two acellular vaccines and one whole cell vaccine against pertussis. Survival of zidovudine-treated patients with AIDS compared to that of contemporary untreated patients
  • Abstracts: Medicaid spending of $75 billion devouring more of state budgets. Poor's health services lost in state's budget battles
  • Abstracts: Court blocks 428 standards in one decision. A different era. OSHA's standards of fairness
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.