Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Health

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Health

Chemical firms alarmed by CHIP 96

Article Abstract:

The HSC's most recent plans for CHIP 96 (the Chemicals (Hazard Information and Packaging for Supply) (Amendment) Regulations 1996) contain an insufficient transitional period, according to the Chemical Industries Association (CIA). This association feels that a transitional period of at least six months is essential if the industry is to be able to make the necessary changes to put into practice the new requirements. It agrees with the HSC that restrictions to professional users will be a particularly difficult area.

Publisher: RoSPA Occuapational Safety Division (UK)
Publication Name: Occupational Safety & Health
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0143-5353
Year: 1995
Chemicals & Allied Products, Chemical Manufacturing, CHEMICALS AND ALLIED PRODUCTS, Chemicals

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


CIA third annual survey

Article Abstract:

Capital spending on environmental protection by the UK chemical industry fell to 12% in 1994 according to the Chemical Industries Association survey concerning health, safety and environmental performance of the industry. However operating expenditure in this areas remains at a high level of 721 million pounds sterling. Discharges of Red List substances has fallen, and energy consumption per unit of output fell. The number of distribution accidents rose slightly in 1994.

Publisher: RoSPA Occuapational Safety Division (UK)
Publication Name: Occupational Safety & Health
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0143-5353
Year: 1995
Management, Chemical Industries Association

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Managing safety: could do better...

Article Abstract:

A survey of six multinational companies operating in the United Kingdom chemicals industry revealed that there was room for improvement in the way they managed safety aspects. Staff responsible for safety were often not given enough power to enforce their recommendations, despite avowals of advocacy coming from top levels in these companies to the importance of safety. There would also be advantages in involving employees in safety to a greater extent.

Author: Tombs, Steve
Publisher: RoSPA Occuapational Safety Division (UK)
Publication Name: Occupational Safety & Health
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0143-5353
Year: 1992
United Kingdom, Cover Story

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Safety and security measures, Chemical industry
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Chemical treatment: destruction and disinfection in one step. Studying Superfund: Superfund, the controversial hazardous-site cleanup program, is under the microscope again
  • Abstracts: New role of nurses and midwives. Safe Motherhood in Tanzania. Listen to the community!
  • Abstracts: New causes for new diseases. Clean water at low cost. A checklist of hazards
  • Abstracts: Being heard. Caring for rape survivors. The reality of rape
  • Abstracts: Health screening survey. United we stand. Hitting the roof
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.