Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Health

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Health

Efficacy of dental radiographic practices: options for image receptors, examination selection, and patient selection

Article Abstract:

Dental radiography or X-ray is used for the initial diagnosis and subsequent follow-up of patients, and constitutes a large portion of dental health care services in the United States. Because of concerns about rising health care costs, various diagnostic devices and procedures must be evaluated for effectiveness and usefulness. Statistical methods for evaluating dental diagnostic procedures as well as recent studies on the effectiveness of these procedures are summarized. Studies have shown that certain types of X-ray film, specifically xeroradiography, E-speed film, and D-speed film, are equally effective for use in most dental X-ray procedures. Xeroradiography and E-speed film are faster than D-speed film and result in less radiation exposure, although xeroradiography is a more complex X-ray procedure. It is recommended that D-speed film be used for detection of tooth decay, and E-speed film for other purposes. A new X-ray method, the panoramic radiograph, shows the entire dental arch including all teeth and supporting structures. It may be combined with the bitewing radiograph, which shows the crowns, or surfaces and upper roots of the teeth, and is taken by biting down on a dental film packet. However, the traditional intraoral radiograph taken within the mouth is superior for detecting common dental diseases, such as tooth decay, periodontal disease affecting the structures supporting the teeth, and periapical disease affecting the end of the root of a tooth. A full mouth survey is costly and unnecessary for a complete dental examination. (Consumer Summary produced by Reliance Medical Information, Inc.)

Author: Kantor, Mel L., Zeichner, Samuel J., Valachovic, Richard W., Reiskin, Allan B.
Publisher: American Dental Association Publishers Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of the American Dental Association
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0002-8177
Year: 1989
Standards, Innovations, Dentistry, Dental care, Teeth, Oral hygiene, Radiography

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


An evaluation of occlusal contact marking indicators: a descriptive quantitative method

Article Abstract:

Not all occlusal indicators produce repeatable markings and may therefore give misleading information, according to dentists who tested 10 indicators. Occlusal indicators are pieces of paper, film, or silk that the dentist places between the upper and lower teeth to determine whether the upper and lower teeth make proper contact.

Author: Millstein, Philip, Maya, Alvaro
Publisher: American Dental Association Publishers Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of the American Dental Association
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0002-8177
Year: 2001
Measurement, Malocclusion

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: Evaluation, Dental equipment and supplies, Dental equipment, Dental supplies
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes
  • Abstracts: Policy of AMA journals regarding release of information to the public. Electroconvulsive Therapy: Time to Bring It Out of the Shadows
  • Abstracts: Effect of Population-Based Interventions on Laboratory Utilization: A Time-Series Analysis. Validation of a Clinical Decision Aid to Discontinue In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitations
  • Abstracts: The impact of universal access to dental care on disparities in caries experience in children. Regular dental visits and dental anxiety in an adult dentate population
  • Abstracts: Intrabony lymphoma simulating periradicular inflammatory disease. Evaluating, documenting and following up oral pathological conditions: a suggested protocol
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.