Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Health

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Health

Justices remove liability protection for device makers

Article Abstract:

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in June 1996 that Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval does not exempt medical device manufacturers from state product-liability laws. The ruling will permit Laura Lohr, whose pacemaker failed three years after its 1987 installation, to sue Medtronic, the device's manufacturer. The court ruled 9-0 that faulty design claims were not prevented by federal law, and 5-4 that negligent manufacture and failure-to-warn claims were also permissible.

Author: Borzo, Greg
Publisher: American Medical Association
Publication Name: American Medical News
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0001-1843
Year: 1996
Regulation, Licensing, and Inspection of Miscellaneous Commercial Sectors, Pacemakers, Product Safety-Medical Equip, Cases, Product liability, Medical equipment, Medical equipment and supplies industry, Medical equipment industry, Product safety, Products liability, Medtronic Inc., MDT, Lohr, Laura

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Eye treatment revolution: providers jumping on laser bandwagon

Article Abstract:

The market for laser eye surgery has burgeoned following the FDA'a approval of Summit Technology's photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) equipment. Laser surgery could become a multibillion dollar business since PRK surgery costs between $1,500 and $2,500 per eye, and an estimated 90% of the 60 mil near-sighted persons are eligible for the procedure. Summit Technology is aggressively marketing PRK procedures through cable television and print advertisements.

Author: Borzo, Greg
Publisher: American Medical Association
Publication Name: American Medical News
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0001-1843
Year: 1996
Laser Surgical Instruments, Management, Marketing, Surgery, Eye, Lasers in surgery, Laser surgery, Eye surgery, Laser industry, Surgical lasers, Photorefractive keratectomy, Summit Technology Inc., BEAM

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Eye surgery at center of storm

Article Abstract:

Three medical groups sued the Idaho Board of Optometry, in May 1996, because the board gave optometrists the right to perform photorefractive keratectomies. The plaintiffs claim physicians are the only group qualified to perform surgery and the laser reshaping of the eye is surgery. Professional standards and millions of dollars of medical business are at stake.

Author: Borzo, Greg
Publisher: American Medical Association
Publication Name: American Medical News
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0001-1843
Year: 1996
Optical Health Centers, Laws, regulations and rules, Vision centers, Radial keratotomy

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Optometrists
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Enabling the disabled. Every patient has a story. Anti-abortion activists shift focus to individuals
  • Abstracts: A penny for your biceps. The mighty arms of Munzer. Shocking treatment
  • Abstracts: Boost for insurance reform. Employer survey predicts growing ranks of uninsured. Much ado about Medicaid: formula dispute threatens block-grant reform; middle-class revolt also feared
  • Abstracts: Nitric oxide is involved in flow-induced dilation of isolated human small fetoplacental arteries. Myogenic and flow-mediated responses in isolated mesenteric small arteries from pregnant and nonpregnant rats
  • Abstracts: Rating long-term care facilities on pressure ulcer development: importance of case-mix adjustment. Predicting the occurrence of adverse events after coronary artery bypass surgery
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.