Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Health

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Health

Patients' rights in managed care - exit, voice, and choice

Article Abstract:

States must provide their residents with an effective and timely dispute resolution mechanism in the event that a patient is denied medical care. Medicare beneficiaries can simply switch to another doctor, but this is hard for most employed people whose employer chooses their health plan. Two court cases reveal that judges are very sensitive to this issue. Many managed care organizations do not have effective grievance procedures and it is not in their financial interest to provide them. But such a service could be provided by consumer groups, the state consumer protection agency or state attorneys general.

Author: Annas, George J.
Publisher: Massachusetts Medical Society
Publication Name: The New England Journal of Medicine
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0028-4793
Year: 1997
Cases, Services, Managed care plans (Medical care), Refusal to treat (Medicine), Dispute resolution (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Unlimited human autonomy - a cultural bias?

Article Abstract:

The Western emphasis on human autonomy and civil rights is not shared by other countries. In Israel in 1993, the Supreme Court ruled against euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide even if the patient requested it. This was followed by a bill passed by the Israeli legislature in 1996 that permits patients to be treated against their will. This was enforced when a judge ordered political prisoners on a hunger strike to be force-fed. Israeli law is influenced by the Jewish faith, which places more value on human life than civil rights.

Author: Glick, Shimon M.
Publisher: Massachusetts Medical Society
Publication Name: The New England Journal of Medicine
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0028-4793
Year: 1997
Israel, Ethical aspects, Medical care decision-making authority (Law), Medical care decision making authority (Law), Autonomy (Philosophy)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The Supreme Court's limitation of managed-care liability

Article Abstract:

The U.S. Supreme Court effectively immunized managed \-care organization (MCOs) for liability for negligent decisions about the care of patients in private employer-sponsored health plans in combined cases of Davila and Calad. These cases demonstrate why Employment Retirement Income Security Act was not well suited to protecting patients or their health benefits.

Author: Mariner, Weny K.
Publisher: Massachusetts Medical Society
Publication Name: The New England Journal of Medicine
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0028-4793
Year: 2004
United States, Regulation, Licensing, and Inspection of Miscellaneous Commercial Sectors, Health Regulation, Medical law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Analysis, Patients, Civil rights
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Zinc in the management of diarrhea in young children. Constipation in children. Hypertension in children
  • Abstracts: The managed care factor in antibiotic resistance. Case management: past, present, future - the drivers for change
  • Abstracts: 'Bringing beauty and brightness to the back streets': health education and public health in England and Wales, 1890-1940
  • Abstracts: How nurses can support people with epilepsy: skilled care and support make a great difference to the quality of life of patients with epilepsy. part 2
  • Abstracts: Shared governance as a way to involve staff in decision-making. Rehabilitation using therapeutic community principles
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.