Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Health

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Health

The "value added" of not-for-profit health plans

Article Abstract:

Not-for-profit health plans are distinguished from for-profit plans by more than just their tax status, and can provide levels of care that will not exist under a purely for-profit system. Non-profits are more accountable to the communities they serve, while for-profits strive only to increase their investors' returns. One way to increase returns is to avoid spending money on community service. While non-profits spend between 91 and 93% of all premiums on their customers and communities, as little of 70% of premium payments at for-profits are returned to the payers in the form of care. The rest goes to administrative costs and investors. This prevents reinvestment into the community, lessens the likelihood of preventative care, and takes money out of the healthcare industry. Non-profits, by seeing their community as their owner, are more likely to serve the interests of the people than for-profits, who serve the interest of the investors.

Author: Nudelman, Phillip M., Andrews, Linda M.
Publisher: Massachusetts Medical Society
Publication Name: The New England Journal of Medicine
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0028-4793
Year: 1996
Editorial, Management, Economic aspects, Health care industry, Health maintenance organizations, Hospitals, Voluntary, Voluntary hospitals, Hospitals, Proprietary, Proprietary hospitals

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The cost effectiveness of strategies for the treatment of intestinal parasites in immigrants

Article Abstract:

Treating all immigrants from certain countries with albendazole may be cost-effective. Albendazole is a drug against parasites such as hookworm, tapeworm and Giardia. Researchers compared the cost-effectiveness of three strategies for treating incoming immigrants: doing nothing, screening and treating those who test positive for parasites, and treating all immigrants without screening them. Treating all immigrants without screening would save about $4 million each year and was the most cost-effective method. Albendazole is relatively inexpensive and is very effective against many parasites.

Author: Muennig, Peter, Pallin, Daniel, Sell, Randall L., Chan, Man-Suen
Publisher: Massachusetts Medical Society
Publication Name: The New England Journal of Medicine
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0028-4793
Year: 1999
Health aspects, Care and treatment, Analysis, Reports, Immigrants, Medical care, Cost of, Health care costs, Cost benefit analysis, Albendazole

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The bite of rabies: prevention and control strategies for rabies zoonosis. part 2 The new Medicare regulations: how will they affect the profession?
  • Abstracts: Interdisciplinary documentation in the NICU. Improving documentation of initial nursing assessment. Conflict management in nursing administration
  • Abstracts: The pedagogic characteristics of a clinical conference for senior residents and family. Intern learning and education in a short stay unit: a qualitative study
  • Abstracts: Impact of tuberculosis on the body composition of HIV0infected men in Brazil. Feeding a habit
  • Abstracts: Preparation makes perfect. Challenging ageism through our speech
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.