Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Human resources and labor relations

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Human resources and labor relations

Administration - fiduciary duty; representations concerning benefits; changes in plans; vesting of health benefits on retirement

Article Abstract:

The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the US was sued by six of its retirees when the former changed the terms of the payment obligations of its medical care plan. The plaintiffs argued that their health benefits vested when they retired at the level available on retirement, that they had certain rights separate from those created by the health benefits plan from individual contracts that Equitable had made with them, and that Equitable violated its fiduciary duty under the ERISA for enforcing the plan under terms that did not exist at the time of their retirement. All three of the plaintiffs' claims, however, were rejected by the courts.

Publisher: International Society of Certified Employee Benefit Specialists
Publication Name: Benefits Quarterly
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 8756-1263
Year: 1999
Life Insurance, Direct Life Insurance Carriers, Retirement Benefits, Managed care plans (Medical care), Retirees, Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Senkier v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Co., 948 F.2d 1050, 14 EBC 2317 (7th Cir. 1991)

Article Abstract:

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals decided in the Senkier versus Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Co case that group accident insurance policy available through ERISA plan does not cover accidents that occur during or as a result of medical treatment. The court further stated that allowing coverage for injuries or death caused by medical treatment changes the accident insurance policy into a medical malpractice policy. In addition, the court also stated that in cases of accidental death during medical treatment, damages for negligence and malpractice are a more appropriate remedy.

Publisher: International Society of Certified Employee Benefit Specialists
Publication Name: Benefits Quarterly
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 8756-1263
Year: 1993
Accident and health insurance, Laws, regulations and rules, Accident insurance, United States. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, Dereng, Donna Jean, Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Co.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: Cases, Insurance industry, Life insurance industry
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Three solutions to the risk in 401(k) plan design. What will health benefits be for the small employer? Avoiding costly design flaws in small 401(k) plans
  • Abstracts: Administration; claims processing and review; denial of disability benefits; standard of review. Estate planning for qualified plans and IRAs
  • Abstracts: The integration-differentiation puzzle: a resource-capability perspective in international human resource management
  • Abstracts: Know, think, see safety. Making an impact on health, safety and the environment. Occupational Safety and Health Agency focuses on accident prevention in 2001
  • Abstracts: Employers take action on ethnic diversity. Poor leadership the biggest barrier to diversity. Most employers lack a diversity strategy
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.