Case digest

Article Abstract:

An insight into straightforward cases of direct sex discrimination is provided. Cases applying s.63A of the Sex Discrimination Act 1975, in which tribunals are now making findings of unlawful discrimination where previously they were unwilling to find any, despite unsatisfactory explanations are discussed.

United States, Government regulation (cont), Government regulation, Laws, regulations and rules

---

Deliberately misleading answers to questionnaire assist inference of discrimination

Article Abstract:

The decision of Newcastle-upon-Tyne employment tribunal in Paulsen v (1) N B Mason Entertainments Ltd. (2) Ferguson (case no. 2501998/04 dated September 1, 2004) is discussed. The case is about sexual discrimination against Miss. Paulsen.

Employment discrimination

---

Ban on recruitment of primary carers was unjustifiable indirect sex discrimination

Article Abstract:

In Davies v Marchmont Medical Practice, an Edinburgh employment tribunal upheld that a company that intentionally avoids recruiting a parent with childcare was unjustifiable indirect sex discrimination.

Similar abstracts:

• Abstracts: Proposed revision of 1976 Equal Treatment Directive. New anti-discrimination body. Employment reforms bill
• Abstracts: Discrimination By Others Than Employers. Indirect Discrimination
• Abstracts: Employers' access to criminal records wil cause discrimination. New equality standard for local councils
• Abstracts: In the courts - continuing discrimination. Failure to allocate work due to pregnancy is sex discrimination. Bring back Bernard Manning
• Abstracts: International adjustment of female vs male business expatriates. Expatriates' hesitation and the localization of western business operations in China

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.