Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Human resources and labor relations

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Human resources and labor relations

Medicare - substitute HMO's - reimbursement from other insurance

Article Abstract:

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in its ruling in the Care Choices HMO v. Engstrom has said that the HMO must sue in the state court for its contractual right to reimbursement. It may not sue in the federal court under the federal statue that merely allows it to provide for reimbursement in their policies. Elizabeth Engstrom suffered serious injuries when she slipped and fell in a supermarket. The HMO sought to recoup its compensation amount from the amount received by Engstrom from the supermarket.

Publisher: International Society of Certified Employee Benefit Specialists
Publication Name: Benefits Quarterly
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 8756-1263
Year: 2004
United States, Medicare, Prospective payment systems (Medical care), United States. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Supreme court review: FMLA - Money damages against states

Article Abstract:

The Supreme Court has upheld the authority of congress to enact remedial legislations clarifying regarding the gender-based discrimination alleged by William Hibbs, a state government employee in Nevada Department of Human resources et. Al. v. Hibbs et. al. under The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA). The case related to termination of Hibbs services.

Publisher: International Society of Certified Employee Benefit Specialists
Publication Name: Benefits Quarterly
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 8756-1263
Year: 2004
Management dynamics, Nevada, Management, Company business management, Parliamentary procedure, Amendments (Parliamentary practice), Gender equality

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Supreme court review: "any willing provider" laws not preempted be Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)

Article Abstract:

The Supreme Court has ruled in the case of Kentucky Association of Health Plans, Inc., et. al. v. Miller, Commissioner, Kentucky Department of Insurance that "Any willing provider" laws are not preempted by Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).

Publisher: International Society of Certified Employee Benefit Specialists
Publication Name: Benefits Quarterly
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 8756-1263
Year: 2004
Government domestic functions, Kentucky, Health policy

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Standards, Company legal issue, Cases, Laws, regulations and rules, Government regulation, Health maintenance organizations, Health insurance industry, State government, United States. Supreme Court, State/local government software
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Guidance on corporate social responsibility: A special report from the European Agency
  • Abstracts: A comparative study of human resource management practices in international joint ventures: the impact of national origin
  • Abstracts: Sexual orientation and religion: an EOR survey. Lessons from the equal pay front line. Equal value update
  • Abstracts: Lessons from the equal pay front line. Recruitment and selection
  • Abstracts: The evolving Portuguese model of HRM. Introduction: human resource management in the Middle East. Cultural orientations and preferences for HRM policies and practices: the case of Oman
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.