No justification where no alternative duties were concerned

Article Abstract:

A Bristol employment tribunal has ruled that the employer discriminated against its employee by not giving alternative duties to an employee who was suffering from trauma after an accident. The case of Hibberd v Royal Mail Group plc is presented.

Royal Mail Group PLC

---

Applicants can have the benefit of terms in more than one comparator's contract

Article Abstract:

The case of Degnan and others v Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council (2) Jarvis Plc. relating to discripancies in compensations of female dominated occupations compared to that in male dominated jobs has been presented.

Jarvis PLC, Working women

---

Victimisation comparator

Article Abstract:

A UK Court of Appeals decision for Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and others v. Khan, a case about discrimination against victims of crimes, is discussed.

Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities, Equal Protection-Other, Equal protection, Victims of crimes, Crime victims

Similar abstracts:

• Abstracts: Compensation culture. A current concern. Accident investigation
• Abstracts: Opening a dialog: communicating with retirees about Medicare+Choice. Medicare+Choice - cost and funding issues for Medicare risk plans
• Abstracts: Practitioners urged to recognise change and motivate line managers. New labour, new HSC
• Abstracts: Let's get physical. Back to the Heinrich triangle - the business case for OSH. Bilbao Agency's mandate under review
• Abstracts: Locking the barn door: a selection of irrevocable errors in qualified retirement plans. Empowering the managed care consumer: Not as easy as it sounds

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.