Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

A deal skewed by greed? Ex-client says her lawyers' implant deal fashioned their payments before hers

Article Abstract:

Breast implant litigant Kali Korn filed suit Oct 3 against her former lawyers and their firms, saying they moved their payments ahead of hers because of the payer's potential bankruptcy. She received $1.8 million before the payments stopped in May when Dow Corning declared bankruptcy; lawyers Salvador Liccardo and Bruce Finzen got $4.2 million, $3 million of it in a separate payment in Feb 1995. Korn points to a settlement she says she was pressured to sign, as well as a letter between the lawyers.

Author: Cox, Gail Diane
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Surgical Appliance and Supplies Manufacturing, Surgical appliances and supplies, Surgical & Radioactive Implants, Analysis, Compromise and settlement, Settlements (Law), Ethical aspects, Legal ethics, Breast implants, Prostheses and implants

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Paul Hastings suit near trial; defunct spinoff at issue

Article Abstract:

Paul, Hastings, Janofsky and Walker and former partner Ronald S. Barak are being sued for fraud and breach of fiduciary duty by an investor in Leasehold Technology Group, which the plaintiff claims was represented as a free-standing investment when it was really an affiliate venture of the law firm. He claims the law firm obtained favorable treatment for its affiliate while the liability was assumed by third-party investors who were not told the whole story.

Author: Cox, Gail Diane
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
Fraud, Fiduciary duties, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker L.L.P.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Insurance defense in a shakeout; in-house influx and tort reform are behind upheaval

Article Abstract:

Insurance defense lawyers are finding their specialty to be less sought after, to the point that some firms have ceased business and some lawyers have followed clients in-house. Reasons include insurance companies' move to cut costs by having more work done in-house; the companies' lessening the ranks of outside counsel to those who can offer the best deals; and tort reform's influence on the practice of law.

Author: Cox, Gail Diane
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
Insurance, Insurance Carriers and Related Activities, INSURANCE CARRIERS, Insurance industry, Attorneys, Influence, Tort reform, Legal specialization

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Lawyers
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Reveal the real witness; don't let other parties show only their best sides to the jury. Looking for the good guy; witnesses don't have to be pretty - just simple and direct
  • Abstracts: Under covered; proponents say fewer lawyers will go bare if forced to disclose their insurance status. Inexpert witness; lies, resume fraud takes down 'expert' before he takes stand again
  • Abstracts: Survey: general counsel face environmental toll. More lawyers expect to urge their clients to examine compliance
  • Abstracts: Firm agrees to record S & L settlement; shifting standards require lawyers to disclose more to regulatory agencies
  • Abstracts: A fatal result to a staged accident; after a fraud scheme goes awry, a California lawyer is tried for murder. No vindication for convicted ex-cop; judge finds bungling, but no evidence of a frame-up in murder investigation
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.