Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

A new test for Lemon; will the courts give a passing grade to school vouchers?

Article Abstract:

The 1998 Wisconsin Supreme Court case of Jackson v. Bennion ruled that educational vouchers did not violate the First Amendment's establishment clause, since they gave money to parents who just happened to spend it on church schools. Civil libertarians argue that the parental choice mechanism is just a gimmick to subsidize religion, but what drives Milwaukee's voucher experiment and others across the US may be parental frustration at public schools' seeming inability to provide high-quality, safe education.

Author: France, Steve
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1998
Educational vouchers, Wisconsin, states

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


'Weighty reasons' for secrecy; effort to acquire posthumous notes spurs attorney-client privilege ruling

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court ruled in Swidler & Berlin v. United States that attorney-client communications remained privileged after the client's death, and the ABA was among the groups encouraging such a holding. The case regarded whether Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr could obtain notes of a conversation between former White House Counsel Vincent Foster and his lawyer just days before Foster's suicide in 1993.

Author: France, Steve
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1998
Confidential communications, Attorney-client privilege

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


A crack in the wall; does First Amendment separate church and Alabama?

Article Abstract:

Alabama Gov Forrest H. James Jr. is arguing that the US Supreme Court cannot keep Alabama students from praying in school since First Amendment guarantees of free speech and religion do not apply to the states. Constitutional law expert A.E. Dick Howard states this argument is discredited and is skeptical it will work, even though the Court has become less tolerant of federal intrusions into state affairs.

Author: Barnes, Patricia G.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1997
Alabama, Religion in the public schools, Religion in schools, Federal-state controversies

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Church and state, United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Employee involvement in the European cooperative society: A range of stakeholders? The directive on employee involvement in the European company: Its role in European corporate governance and industrial relations
  • Abstracts: The courts and private ADR: partners in serving justice. ADR in technology disputes
  • Abstracts: An overview of the antitrust analysis of suppression of technology. Foreword
  • Abstracts: "Workers' contracts" under the United States Arbitration Act: an essay in historical clarification. Capturing volition itself: employee involvement and the TEAM Act
  • Abstracts: Consumer dealings. Debt collection and the Trade Practices Act
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.