Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Beware: your rights could be crimes

Article Abstract:

The US judicial system places businesses at a disadvantage due to contradictory regulations which do not protect witnesses in cases against self-incrimination. Under the Fifth Amendment, witnesses are not allowed to testify against themselves in court. However, the law requires companies to furnish private documents for examination upon the request of the government. The law can be used against businesses in gathering evidence in cases concerning environmental infractions such as the Texas Eastman Chemical Company case wherein the firm was fined for emissions.

Author: Lynch, Timothy
Publisher: Cato Institute
Publication Name: Regulation
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0147-0590
Year: 1997
Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities, Investigative Procedures, Analysis, Laws, regulations and rules, Evidence (Law), White collar crimes, White collar crime, Investigations, Self-incrimination, Self incrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Republicans fixing to nationalize gambling issue

Article Abstract:

The Republican Party should not attempt to restrict gambling by misguided laws as this is a direct violation of the 10th amendment that guarantees civil liberties. There are questions regarding the gambling issue and regulators should be careful that they do not override civil liberties in the process. Interpretation of the constitution maintains that the pursuit of happiness is a basic civil liberty.

Author: Lynch, Timothy
Publisher: Cato Institute
Publication Name: Regulation
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0147-0590
Year: 1998
Misc. Amusement, Recreation Services, Legal Gambling, Gambling Industries, Interpretation and construction, Economic policy, Gambling industry, Gambling, Republican Party (United States)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Beware: your rights could be crimes (Part II)

Article Abstract:

Court rulings are giving way to the needs of law enforcement over time. The Fourth Amendment, which protects the right of people from unlawful search and seizures, seems to diminish statute against governmental regulations. Observers suggest that Congress should act at once to block all legislations that will authorize warrantless entry into private properties and premises.

Author: Lynch, Timothy
Publisher: Cato Institute
Publication Name: Regulation
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0147-0590
Year: 1997
Searches and seizures, Law enforcement, Public opinion, Warrants (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Column, Civil rights
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: U.K. House of Lords rules compound interest applies to ACT compensation claims. Tax treaties and the internal market in the new European scenario
  • Abstracts: Helping your clients understand trust planning. 706 preparation simplified. Lawgical solution
  • Abstracts: Huge fees don't foil his company. Directing change at ITT industries
  • Abstracts: Tobacco ruling could curtail client privilege; court's easy standard for ordering disclosure may become the U.S. rule
  • Abstracts: Computers 101: the basics. Information management. Getting the job done: how to chip away at your priorities
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.