Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Courtroom cameras face new scrutiny; critics say Simpson case should not be televised

Article Abstract:

The much-criticized trial of OJ Simpson for murder ultimately vindicated his controversial defense team and its strategy of picking at prosecution errors. Some observers noted that it is possible to raise reasonable doubt about anything, and others said lead defense counsel Johnnie Cochran went too far in his closing speech. The prosecution's case relied on forensic evidence, ultimately raising the troubling triad of a glove that did not fit; a lying, racist cop; and sloppy forensic work. Critics of cameras in the courtroom feel the trial vindicated their fears.

Author: Reske, Henry J.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1995
Public opinion, Cameras in the courtroom, Cameras in court

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Verdict on Simpson trial: observers say prosecution lost the case over a bloody glove, racist cop

Article Abstract:

The much-criticized trial of OJ Simpson for murder ultimately vindicated his controversial defense team and its strategy of picking at prosecution errors. Some observers noted that it is possible to raise reasonable doubt about anything, and others said lead defense counsel Johnnie Cochran went too far in his closing speech. The prosecution's case relied on forensic evidence, ultimately raising the troubling triad of a glove that did not fit; a lying, racist cop; and sloppy forensic work.

Author: Reske, Henry J.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1995
Analysis, Discrimination in criminal justice administration, Criminal justice discrimination, Evidence, Criminal, Criminal evidence

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


A childhood tragedy vexes courts; case of 9-year-old accused killer remanded for decision on adult trial

Article Abstract:

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has sent the Cameron Kocher case back to the trial court in a continuation of the battle over whether to try the boy as an adult for his murder of Jessica Ann Carr. He was nine at the time of the crime and the victim was seven years old. If the case does end up in juvenile court, Kocher would be treated as a 'dependent,' meaning the emphasis would be on rehabilitation, rather than a 'delinquent,' where he could be sent to a juvenile home.

Author: Reske, Henry J.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1992
Juvenile courts, Waiver of jurisdiction of, Waiver of juvenile court jurisdiction

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, California, Murder, Simpson, O.J.
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Woes from '80s face new boss at Jones Day; storm clouds loom on several fronts, including an RTC trial. Jones Day's big dowry handed to many suitors
  • Abstracts: Industry, feds monitor oil royalty suit; official says oil companies owe Texas millions because of underpaid royalties
  • Abstracts: Surprise! The employment news isn't as bad as had been feared. New placement survey confirms just how bleak job market is
  • Abstracts: Habeas corpus. Federal courts - prisoner litigation - Eleventh Circuit holds that a s. 1983 action for DNA access is not the equivalent of a habeas corpus petition
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.