Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Debates need minor players

Article Abstract:

An election cannot really be called free when only the two candidates put forth by the major parties can speak. The founding fathers believed a market place of ideas is necessary in a democracy. The government adds to the rigidity of the two-party system by placing the debates under the control of commissions whose membership is drawn from the two major parties. Their decision to include only candidates who are realistically electable in the debate leaves out minor-party candidates. The debates are no longer a marketplace of ideas.

Author: Klotz, John C.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
Management, Presidential candidates, Campaign debates

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Courtroom jousts now done by committee

Article Abstract:

The trial lawyer as paladin and lone crusader may be giving way to groups of lawyers for the defense and the prosecution or plaintiff, due to increasing complexity in the law and in scientific evidence. The great trial lawyers of the past have always used supporting casts, but they have also always been the sole voice in the courtroom, maintaining control and building a relationship. The success of OJ Simpson's defense team, uncoordinated as it often was, may indicate the way of the future.

Author: Klotz, John C.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Analysis, Sole practitioners, Sole practitioners (Lawyers), Trial practice

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Abortion decision undercuts rule of law

Article Abstract:

A federal district court decision to use jury nullification to acquit protesters who violated a court order not to block the entrance to an abortion clinic, pointing out that the protesters acted out of religious conviction, violates the duty of a judge to apply the law to the facts he sees before him. The decision disparages the moral force of the original judicial order and attacks other judges who might ignore abortion protesters' moral prerogatives.

Author: Klotz, John C.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
Cases, Freedom of religion, Pro-life movement, Contempt of court

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: American corporations and the economic future of South Africa. New challenges for corporate responsibility
  • Abstracts: What's new in Blue; citation guidelines change along with the times. Blast prosecutor vows no media circus: Hartzler described as fair, low-key family man who has bomb-trial experience
  • Abstracts: The logical outgrowth doctrine in rulemaking. Administrative adjudication under health care reform
  • Abstracts: An ounce of prevention. Advanced underwriting concepts. Family key person insurance or sometimes advanced marketing should be kid stuff
  • Abstracts: Tax considerations in selecting commodity and securities trading entities. Tax considerations in selecting commodity and securities trading entities and advisers
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.