Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Defending the corporate bastion: proportionality and the treatment of draconian defenses from Unocal to Unitrin

Article Abstract:

The Delaware Supreme Court's ruling in Unitrin, Inc. v. American General Corp. revises the standards set forth in Unocal Corp. v. Mesa Petroleum Co. for assessing the efforts of corporate directors in fending off hostile takeovers. Unocal established the proportionality test for determining whether the actions of directors in response to a perceived threat to the corporation and shareholders fell within the business judgment rule. Unitrin bifurcates this standard by first considering if director actions preclude or coerce shareholder control in a draconian fashion and, if not, if the actions could be considered reasonable.

Author: Werkheiser, Gregory W.
Publisher: Widener University School of Law
Publication Name: Delaware Journal of Corporate Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0364-9490
Year: 1996
Mergers & Acquisitions, Acquisitions and mergers, Business judgment rule

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


When must a board of directors dilute a controlling shareholder?

Article Abstract:

The Delaware Court of Chancery, in Mendel v. Carroll, found no reason to require the board of directors to dilute the controlling shareholders' interest, since the shareholders' refusal to sell was proper under their fiduciary obligations. Although denying the plaintiffs' request for a preliminary injunction, the court recognized both the controlling shareholders' stake in the situation and the minority shareholders' desire to obtain fair value.

Author: Werkheiser, Gregory W.
Publisher: Widener University School of Law
Publication Name: Delaware Journal of Corporate Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0364-9490
Year: 1995
Minority stockholders

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


To whom it may concern: fiduciary duties and business associations

Article Abstract:

The author discusses the fiduciary duties of managers of `partnerships, corporations, and limited liability companies. Topics include the nature of business associations and the identification and articulation of group interests to explain fiduciary duties.

Author: Dalley, Paula J.
Publisher: Widener University School of Law
Publication Name: Delaware Journal of Corporate Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0364-9490
Year: 2001
States, Disclosure statements (Accounting)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Corporate directors, Case Note, Delaware, Corporate anti-takeover measures, Antitakeover strategies, Fiduciary duties
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The conception that the corporation is a nexus of contracts, and the dual nature of the firm. Measuring the domain of mediating hierarchy: how contestable are U.S. public corprations?
  • Abstracts: Forward: implementing the Constitution. Rights, rules, and the structure of constitutional adjudication: a response to Professor Fallon
  • Abstracts: Ambiguity in corporation law. Corporate law in the twenty-first century: the practitioners' prognosis. The pride and the hope of Delaware corporate law
  • Abstracts: The ERISA preemption doctrine and the assignment of employee welfare plan benefits. Of scrivener's errors, walk-in CAP, and the correction of "inadvertent plan document failures"
  • Abstracts: The opinions of the International Court of Justice on the threat or use of nuclear weapons. United Nations governance of postconflict societies
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.