Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Forward: implementing the Constitution

Article Abstract:

Fidelity to and implementation of constitutional values requires more of the US Supreme Court than abstract theoretical arguments. The Court is an institution of individuals who must engage in a process of compromise to achieve practical results. Implementation of constitutional values is a necessary function of the Court often achieved through the use of doctrinal tests which may not precisely mirror the Justices' conceptions of the meaning of the Constitution. 'Extraordinary' cases can be distinguished from 'ordinary' cases by the Court's willingness to design new doctrine.

Author: Fallon, Richard H., Jr.
Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1997
Interpretation and construction, Constitutional interpretation, Powers and duties, United States. Supreme Court

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


As-applied and facial challenges and third-party standing

Article Abstract:

The author argues that academic and judicial discussions concerning the proper application of facial or as-applied statutory challenges have been addressing the issue from the wrong standpoint. Doctrinal tests determine whether facial or as-applied standards are to be applied. Third-party standing standards are subject to similar analyses.

Author: Fallon, Richard H., Jr.
Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 2000
Adler, Matthew D.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Rights, rules, and the structure of constitutional adjudication: a response to Professor Fallon

Article Abstract:

The author comments on the argument of Richard H. Fallon, Jr. concerning applications of facial or as-applied tests in cases of statutory challenges. The author believes that his own model is preferable for reasons which include its recognition of constitutional norms.

Author: Adler, Matthew D.
Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 2000
Fallon, Richard H., Jr.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Constitutional law, Analysis, Cases, Criticism and interpretation, Jurisprudence
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Professor Stefan Albrecht Riesenfeld: a tribute. War and international adjudication: reflections on the 1899 Peace Conference
  • Abstracts: Innovation and the structure of competition. Innovation and the structure of competition: future markets in European and American law
  • Abstracts: Taking text and structure seriously: reflections on free-form method in constitutional interpretation. eroG .v hsuB and its disguises: freeing Bush v. Gore from its hall of mirrors
  • Abstracts: Comment; institutions and interpretation: a critique of City of Boerne v. Flores. Constitutional law - Treaty Clause - District Court holds that NAFTA is a valid exercise of the foreign commerce power. - Made in the USA Foundation v. United States
  • Abstracts: The Constitution in Congress: the Third Congress, 1793-1795. Rumors of wars: presidential and congressional war powers, 1809-1829
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.