Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Different jury different verdict? A rehearing on change of venue

Article Abstract:

The aftermath of the Rodney King verdict has included both legislative and judicial developments. Judges trying police brutality cases have made extra efforts to select unbiased jurors and protect both parties' rights to fair trial. Legislators in New Jersey and California have introduced laws to avoid another Rodney King case by requiring that demographics be considered in venue change decisions. The New Jersey bill would require the judge to choose a new venue similar in racial, ethnic and socioeconomic respects. The California bill would just mandate that demographics be a consideration in the venue change.

Author: Hansen, Mark
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1992
Influence, Political aspects, Rodney King Verdict Aftermath, 1992

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Remedial ruling: a New York decision allowing damages for state constitutional violations could spur suits elsewhere

Article Abstract:

The New York Court of Appeals ruled in Brown v. State that the lower court could hear claims that the state constitutional rights of about 300 blacks in Oneonta had been violated by police investigating an assault. The plaintiffs had asked the Court to recognize constitutional remedies for equal protection and search and seizure violations, but the Court ruled that all state constitutional violations were actionable against the state. Nine other states recognize state constitutional torts.

Author: Hansen, Mark
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1997
Civil Rights, Government liability, Constitutional torts, New York (State), states

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


No place to hide

Article Abstract:

US citizens should carefully consider the implications of accepting the imposition of limits on personal privacy in the fight against terrorism. Police are increasingly using video surveillance or contraband detection technologies to prevent crime, but such techniques could be easily abused to erode traditional civil liberties. Critics say a reasonable suspicion standard or other standards for use should be developed.

Author: Hansen, Mark
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1997
Privacy, United States, Cover Story, Privacy, Right of, Right of privacy, Electronic surveillance, Police patrol, Police surveillance

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Discrimination in criminal justice administration, Criminal justice discrimination, Police misconduct, Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: COBRA notice and coverage not required of disappearing employer following sale of assets. HCFA issues proposed rules for electronic transactions involving health plan data by health plans health care clearinghouses and health care providers
  • Abstracts: MBA lawyer means business in-house. A reshaped staff signaled success. Managing his own lawyers' paper trail
  • Abstracts: How to incorporate retirement benefits into an estate plan. Final GST tax regulations make important changes. Allocating a client's GST exemption most effectively
  • Abstracts: Proposed Roth IRA regulations issued in question and answer format
  • Abstracts: Locking horns for his alma mater. She tries to get lawyers wholesale. Silicone suits and bankruptcy woes
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.