Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Due process and witness anonymity

Article Abstract:

Monroe Leigh feels that the accused in Prosector v. Tadic before the international war crimes tribunal for former Yugoslavia did not receive a fair trial because he was not allowed to face the witnesses or victims. However, the tribunal was correct in withholding the witnesses and victims' identities given that the tribunal had no way to protect them and they faced real fears concerning their safety and that of their families. The competing interests of the accused and the witnesses and victims were considered but the accused's needs were not automatically given more weight.

Author: Chinkin, Christine M.
Publisher: American Society of International Law
Publication Name: American Journal of International Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0002-9300
Year: 1997
Practice, Criticism and interpretation, War crimes, International courts, Right to fair and impartial trial, Fair trial, international, Leigh, Monroe

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The due process right to opt out of class actions

Article Abstract:

Two due process arguments based upon the fact pattern from Adams v. Robertson support the right to opt out of class action lawsuits for either monetary or nonmonetary reasons. The first argument is based upon the judicial action in Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts and extends the opt out right for class members without monetary damages. The second argument is based upon the two prong procedural fairness test in Mathews-Doehr and would grant opt out rights to members who lack minimum contacts with the forum state.

Author: Cottreau, Steven T.O.
Publisher: New York University Law Review
Publication Name: New York University Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0028-7881
Year: 1998
United States, Class actions (Civil procedure), Class action lawsuits, Case Note

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The Crown Court Witness Service: little help in the witness box

Article Abstract:

Issues discussed concern the services rendered by the Crown Court Witness Service in England and Wales, focusing on the lack of support systems for witnesses who must testify in court in front of the defendant. Topics addressed include the emotional aspects of providing evidence from the witness box, speaking aloud and with composure when under stress, and responding to cross-examinations.

Author: Riding, Allison
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0265-5527
Year: 1999
United Kingdom, Psychological aspects, Examination of witnesses, Witness examination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Protection and preservation, Witnesses, Due process of law, Witness protection
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: U.S. patent policy and biotechnology: growing pains on the cutting edge. The Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) in 1992
  • Abstracts: DNA = do not appropriate, say soldiers and civilians; unregulated growth of genetic testing sparks resistance in the military, concern by civilians over its potential misuse
  • Abstracts: What price uniformity? Securing franchisee compliance with suggested retail prices. International franchising: suggestions for compliance
  • Abstracts: The economic necessity of an increased subscriber line charge (SLC) in telecommunications. Market reforms in telecommunications licensing
  • Abstracts: Juvenile-adult differences in criminal justice: evidence from the United Nations crime survey. Doctors, rape and criminal justice
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.