Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Foreign parties invoke U.S. law to seek evidence; while Sec. 1782 is an important device, rules on its application vary among circuit courts

Article Abstract:

USC 1782 governs the gathering of evidence in the US for use in foreign litigaton, providing for application to federal district court by foreign courts and parties to foreign litigation for an order directing a witness to testify or produce physical evdencce. USC 1782 may be invoked by litigants or courts in countries not signatories to the Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters, as it is separate and distinct from that convention. Interpretations of USC 1782 vary greatly among federal district courts, as the rule is complicated in its application.

Author: Beard, W. Cameron
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1999
International aspects, Evidence (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Courts say 'no go' to latent defect claims; most state and federal courts continue to invoke threshold requirement of actual injury

Article Abstract:

Issues regarding the rejection of products liability claims based on latent defects based on the threshold requirement of actual injury are discussed. A plaintiff must allege both an injury in fact and damages when making product liabilility claims.

Author: Walker, Karen N., Schutzman, Lee A.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 2000

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Suits taget 'clean air' gas additive; plaintiffs allege that MTBE is a defective product; defendants say the Clean Air Act preempts this claim

Article Abstract:

Litigation targeting the use of methyl tertiary butyl ether as a "clean" fuel additive is discussed. Most suits charge the refiners and distributors of MTBE-enhanced gasoline knew of the threats it posed to groundwater

Author: Imhoff, Earl J., Enger, William K.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 2001
All Other Basic Organic Chemical Manufacturing, Industrial organic chemicals, not elsewhere classified, Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether, Gasoline Additives, Usage, MTBE, Fuel additives, Air quality, Methyl tertiary butyl ether

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Product liability, Products liability
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Shopper's guide to case management software. Presentation software for idiots. Accounting software for solos
  • Abstracts: Running for coverage: hearing 'no' for an answer does not have to be the final word when an insurance company denies a client's claim
  • Abstracts: Federal evidence; looking at vital rules. Evidence; amendments. Evidence; proposed rules
  • Abstracts: Protection plan; insurance can give important safeguard against employee claims. Home work problems; employers must address liabilities of telecommuting
  • Abstracts: Compromising confidences: recent court rulings weaken privileges protecting private communications. Walk through history in legal London; barrister's guidebook to Inns of Court district speaks to shared heritage
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.