Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Functional analysis, subsidies, and the dormant commerce clause

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court attempted to establish a bright-line test for the permissibility of state subsidies in West Lynn Creamery, Inc. v. Healy, but the distinctions the Court draws are artificial and inconsistent with the goals of the Commerce Clause. The Court used the dormant commerce clause to strike down a state tax on the milk industry. The Court stated that the tax would have been permissible if the subsidies paid to in-state producers would have been paid from general funds and not from a separate account. The better approach would be to strike down any industry-specific taxes not justified by the externalities the industry imposes.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1997
Interstate commerce, Case Note, Subsidies

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


"Common sense" legislation: the birth of neoclassical tort reform

Article Abstract:

The "common sense" tort reforms introduced in the US Congress in 1995 are based on classical tort reform arguments introduced by academics in the 1970s, and legislators should look to more contemporary scholarship to find more enlighten ways to reform the tort system. Classical tort reform was a response to the expansion of the tort system in the progressive era. The modernist approach now dominant in legal scholarship is better able to limit abuses of the tort system without damaging access to insurance or weakening the deterrent effect of the tort system.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1996
Analysis, Laws, regulations and rules, Influence, Jurisprudence, Law and politics

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


State tort reform - Ohio Supreme Court strikes down state General Assembly's tort reform inititative - State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. Sheward, 715 N.E.2d 1062 (Ohio 1999)

Article Abstract:

An Ohio Supreme Court ruling invalidating a state tort reform initiative on the ground that it usurps judicial power is discussed. The author argues that the state court should not have relied on the 'one-subject' rule to strike down the entire law.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 2000
Ohio

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Constitutional law, states, Tort reform
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Equal opportunities and the prison service in England and Wales. Providing a secure home for older residents: evaluation of an initiative in Plymouth
  • Abstracts: Correctional Officer Attitudes Toward Inmates and Working With Inmates in a "Get Tough" Era. Toward and Understanding of the Perception of HIV/AIDS-Related Risk Among Prison Officers
  • Abstracts: Prison suicide and prisoner coping. Prison management trends, 1975-2025
  • Abstracts: Rat day afternoon. Free speech on the firing line: the legal controversy continues. Muzzling the speech cops
  • Abstracts: Mass torts: the Windsor decision and considerations for a coordinated defense. Discovery of litigation databases stored on the Internet: a basis for libel?
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.