Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Further victories for minority shareholders

Article Abstract:

The Australian High Court and Federal Court made two separate rulings in favor of minority shareholders. The High Court decision, in Gambotto v. WCP, held that shares were property rights and so could not be expropriated by the majority shareholders. The Federal Court decision, in Aloridge Pty Ltd v. West Australian Gem Explorers Pty Ltd, allowed a minority shareholder to amend a provisional liquidation application with allegations of mismanagement despite the corporation directors' opposition.

Author: Baxt, Robert
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1995
Liquidation, Articles of incorporation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The Ralph "Report"

Article Abstract:

The Ralph Committee has issued a "Review of Business Taxation" for Australia. The Committee has comprehensively outlined the various options in this area, but it is doubtful that the Australian government will act on any of them given its penchant for piecemeal tax legislation. The report covers the taxation of entities, competition law, and corporate takeovers.

Author: Baxt, Robert
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1999
Taxation, Reports, Corporate taxes, Tax reform, Corporations

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Can a minority shareholder oppress a majority shareholder -- not in most cases!

Article Abstract:

Polyresins Pty. Ltd., a 1998 decision of the Queensland Supreme Court, in which the company's majority shareholder sought an order for oppression, is discussed. The court rejected the request, noting that the shareholder was really seeking an order to have his investment liquidated, not an order for oppression..

Author: Baxt, Robert
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1998
Stockholders

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Australia, Cases, Minority stockholders
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: This time around, the Eighth Circuit comes down with a reversal of Brown. Brown Group shows interplay between Subpart F and partnership provisions
  • Abstracts: The case for. The case against. Drafting exclusive territory provisions in franchise agreements
  • Abstracts: Goin' to the dogs: mushers take to the trails in the ultimate team sport. After Kandinsky: lawyers paint themselves out of their analytical corner
  • Abstracts: Reforming the shareholder proposal process. The new shareholder proposal rules. Developments under section 16
  • Abstracts: Current issues in private placements: private/public offerings. part 2 The statutory scheme for public and private offerings under the Securities Act of 1933
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.