Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Hidden danger; unwary attorneys may face liability under ERISA

Article Abstract:

ERISA issues can arise in many areas seemingly unrelated to employee benefits such as estate planning, family law and business transactions. ERISA provides a cause of action against fiduciaries for employee benefit plans who breach their duties under the act. Attorneys will probably shy away from being ERISA fiduciaries since they are jointly and severally liable for losses of plan assets and have an affirmative obligation to discover breaches of other fiduciaries and report them. Moreover, attorney malpractice insurance tends not to cover ERISA fiduciary claims.

Author: Ashton, Bruce L., Reish, C. Frederick, Terman, Mark E.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1993

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Sixth Circuit adopts non-statutory affirmative disclosure obligation for ERISA fiduciaries

Article Abstract:

The US 6th and 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Krohn v. Huron Memorial Hospital and Ames v. American National Can Co. provided opinions which contribute to the conflict of US Court of Appeals opinions regarding the affirmative disclosure duties of ERISA fiduciaries. The 6th Circuit applied an affirmative duty to inform, while the 7th Circuit refused to due so. The US Supreme Court had previously applied a negative duty not to misinform employee benefit plan participants, but did not address the scope of affirmative disclosure.

Publisher: Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
Publication Name: Tax Management Compensation Planning Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-8607
Year: 1999
United States, Employee Benefits & Services, Human resource management

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Balancing prudence and risk; under ERISA, pension plan investors must focus on participants' goals

Article Abstract:

Pension plan investment mgrs and their attorneys often eschew so-called risky investments in an effort to remain prudent, but doing so overlooks risks the courts have noted. In at least one major case, the court foudn a fiduciary breach for ignoring the risk of loss due to inflation, and the spread or interest rate risk. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act does not focus purely on the risk of loss of principal, and low investment returns can spur plan beneficiaries to sue a plan's trustees.

Author: Reish, C. Frederick, Levin, David R., Moore, James E.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1996
Management, Institutional investments

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Pension funds, Employee benefits, Fiduciary duties, United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Condition treatable with medication not a "disability" under ADA. Salary continuation plan terminated by operation of law following RTC takeover of failed thrift
  • Abstracts: Law of lawyering; new ALI restatement for attorneys could affect malpractice liability, ABA model ethics code
  • Abstracts: Causation in fact in product liability failure to warn cases. The impact of the Cipollone case on federal preemption law
  • Abstracts: The Coasean firm in law and economics. Limited liability unlimited. Choosing law by contract
  • Abstracts: Positive discipline and labor arbitration. Immunity vs. liability in arbitral adjudication. AIDS in the workplace: judicial and arbitral responses
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.