Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

How rule 30(b)(6) became a Trojan horse: a proposal for a change

Article Abstract:

Rule 30(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure places an unfair burden on the defense in litigation by undermining both the work product doctrine and attorney-client confidentiality. Organizations can best protect themselves from the dangers of this rule by structuring internal investigations in a manner that makes as much information as possible privileged. The organization's spokesperson should be well prepared, but is not obligated to share with the court the way in which their knowledge was gleaned.

Author: Elbein, Bradley M.
Publisher: Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel
Publication Name: Federation of Insurance & Corporate Counsel Quarterly
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0887-0942
Year: 1996
Depositions

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Mandatory disclosure - panacea or poison?

Article Abstract:

The mandatory disclosure rules contained in or resulting from Rule 26(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure have been the subject of much controversy but are amenable to new strategies which can improve their operation. Published literature contains arguments on either side of the controversy. However, attorneys must work around any administrative or ethical problems encountered in an attempt to comply with the spirit of the rules while fully representing their clients.

Author: Cooper, B.J.
Publisher: Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel
Publication Name: Federation of Insurance & Corporate Counsel Quarterly
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0887-0942
Year: 1997
Analysis, Confidential communications, Attorney-client privilege

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Diary for federal civil litigation in the wake of the 1993 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Article Abstract:

The 1993 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are discussed, as they apply to insurance industry defense litigation. Questions raised by the amendments include their scope and date of effect. A checklist and set of forms meant to aid practitioners in preparing a defense under the new rules of procedure are included and discussed in detail.

Author: Daniels, John P., Hepler, Larry E., Roedder, William C., Jr.
Publisher: Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel
Publication Name: Federation of Insurance & Corporate Counsel Quarterly
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0887-0942
Year: 1995
Federal courts, Practice

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Discovery (Law), Civil procedure
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Treatment of retirement funds clarified. Bankruptcy proposal is bad medicine
  • Abstracts: Unemployment compensation: a proposal for an optional system of self-insurance. State high risk pools for the uninsurable - a critical analysis
  • Abstracts: The BBS Supreme Court case - a cloth too short for an obi & too long for a tasuki. Japan: highlight of amendments to the Unfair Competition Prevention Law and an outline of the new law
  • Abstracts: Toward a more diverse judiciary: the ABA needs to look at its process of evaluating nominees for the bench. Under the congressional microscope: Judicial Conference responds to senator's request to curb judiciary's expenses
  • Abstracts: The ABC's of EMG. The use of class actions in personal injury cases. Ex parte contacts with plaintiffs' treating physicians
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.