Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Introduction of the Japanese Patent Office Society

Article Abstract:

The Japanese Patent Office Society, known as Tokugikon, consists of 1,400 officials of the Japanese patent office and 800 former officials. Tokugikon publishes a society handbook and bimonthly journal. Japan's industrial property system is 110 years old, although major patent law changes were enacted in 1993 and 1994. International harmonization of laws is a major issue. Ideally, both the US and Japanese patent office societies will work together and share ideas, despite the differences between the two systems.

Author: Kurati, Yasuyuki
Publisher: Patent and Trademark Office Society
Publication Name: Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0882-9098
Year: 1997
United States, Analysis, Japan, Practice, Japan. Patent Office, Patent offices

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


U.S. continuity law and its impact on the comparative patenting rates of the US, Japan and the European Patent Office

Article Abstract:

The model used by Cecil D. Quillen, Jr. and Ogden H. Webster in their report on rates of granting of patents is decieving. The United States Trademark and Patent Office actually grants patents at a less frequent rate than Quillen and Webster claim. In addition, comparative patent grant rates between the US, Japan, and Europe do not really reveal the rigorousness of patent examination in the jurisdictions.

Author: Clarke, Robert A.
Publisher: Patent and Trademark Office Society
Publication Name: Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0882-9098
Year: 2003
Quillen, Cecil D., Jr., Webster, Ogden H.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The U.S. first-to-invent system, the Mossinghoff conclusion, ...and statistics

Article Abstract:

Gerald Mossinghoff's contention that the US first-to-invent patent system discriminates against "small entities" is logically flawed. It is also based in Mossinghoff's misinterpretation of patent statistics.

Author: White, James E.
Publisher: Patent and Trademark Office Society
Publication Name: Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0882-9098
Year: 2003
Evaluation, Mossinghoff, Gerald

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Comparative analysis, Patent law, Statistics, Copyrights, Criticism and interpretation, Patents, Patent/copyright issue
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Extraterritoriality in U.S. and EU antitrust enforcement. Transatlantic turbulence: the Boeing-McDonnell Douglas merger and international competition policy
  • Abstracts: Is DOJ above the rules? The department's bid to exempt lawyers from contact rule is blasted by states' chief justices
  • Abstracts: Collective bargaining in the absence of protective legislation: the case of Louisiana. Common law or common sense: arbitral contract construction
  • Abstracts: Noncancellable disability insurance policies undergo sweeping changes as provisions are tightened
  • Abstracts: Independent contractors or employees: the view from the National Labor Relations Board. Unit placement decisions in acute care hospitals
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.