Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Judges foresee federal courts caseload crush; but judicial panel's study doesn't call for radical changes - not yet, anyway

Article Abstract:

The US Judicial Conference's Long Range Planning Committee foresees increased congestion in the federal courts. The committee has released its Proposed Long Range Plan for the Federal Courts predicting a fourfold increase in cases by the year 2020. Solutions offered include limiting the access to appellate courts, increased use of alternative dispute resolution, restoring a minimum-amount-in-controversy requirement and allowing unilateral filling of judicial positions which have been open for a long time by either the Senate or the president.

Author: Samborn, Randall
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Forecasts and trends, Federal courts, Court congestion and delay, Court delay

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


U.S. civil procedure revisited; committee debates further amendments

Article Abstract:

The US Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Civil Rules has recommended major changes in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Adding mandatory disclosure to the discovery rules is their most controversial recommendation. It is hoped that mandatory disclosure would expedite litigation by requiring parties to exchange information before formal discovery requests. Proposed changes to Rule 11 include a "safe harbor" clause which would shield attorneys who amend or withdraw such documents from sanctions.

Author: Samborn, Randall
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
Innovations, Reports, Discovery (Law), Civil procedure, United States. Judicial Conference

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


ERISA is prototype for pre-emption: management lawyers like the coherence; plaintiffs' lawyers say their clients lose out

Article Abstract:

While the US Congress considers whether to use the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 as a model for national healthcare reform, lawyers continue to debate the act's merits and drawbacks. Employers generally favor the law for the coherence it brought to a complex and geographically dispersed subject, while plaintiffs claim the law threw out common-law tradition to favor large corporations. The technical and obscure provisions have produced a rapidly increasing number of lawsuits recently.

Author: Samborn, Randall
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Employee benefits, Exclusive and concurrent legislative powers, Preemption (Legislative power)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA

Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Ruling caps campaign rhetoric; judicial elections. Court-future forum airs current peeves. Ill. voters go to polls in new judicial balloting
  • Abstracts: Sears reps practiced law illegally; but using real lawyers in credit card debt sessions might be too expensive
  • Abstracts: Feminists back anti-porn bill; critics say holding pornographers liable for rape chills protected speech. Speech without fees not free: court strikes down ban on honoraria for federal workers
  • Abstracts: Rebellious grand jurors hire lawyer; twelve who heard Rocky Flats evidence want to criticize plea, avoid charges
  • Abstracts: Recent attorneys general have made it hard for independent counsels to function. Prosecutors have used criminal statutes to deter others from spreading AIDS
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.