Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Neo no-fault products liability and the product design engineer

Article Abstract:

Neo no-fault products liability provides for a compensation system similar to that of workman's compensation. An injured party would have the option to be compensated with 180 days for economic damages in exchange for relinquishing right to bring tort action. Amount of damages would be standardized, and if the manufacturer does not offer settlement, traditional standards remain. This system offers a reduced standard of care and a higher burden of proof on the manufacturer's behavior which will benefit project engineers, particularly in encouraging employment of a design-team safety engineer.

Author: Matthews, Robert A., Jr.
Publisher: Elsevier Science Publishers
Publication Name: Journal of Products Liability
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0363-0404
Year: 1992
Product development

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The strategic benefit of in-house counsel for products liability defendants

Article Abstract:

Producers of potentially hazardous products enjoy strategic benefits in the employment of in-house counsel above the obvious advantages of increased specialization, integrated liability prevention and economies of scale. The advantage is to be found in decreased settlement amounts for those cases settled in pretrial bargaining. This is because the in-house attorney is a fixed cost and variable costs to the defendant are non-attorney costs while both attorney and non-attorney costs are variable for those employing outside attorneys. Thus, in-house counsel leads to a bargaining advantage.

Author: Miceli, Thomas J.
Publisher: Elsevier Science Publishers
Publication Name: Journal of Products Liability
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0363-0404
Year: 1992
Management, Corporate counsel

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Carpal tunnel syndrome: a products liability prospective

Article Abstract:

Carpal tunnel syndrome is a form of personal illness resulting from repetitive motion from the interaction of the hand and a manufactured device. A products liability action may therefore seek remedy for injury not compensated by any applicable worker's compensation. Negligence in distribution of products has five elements: duty to act or not act, breach of duty, actual or proximate causation, and actual harm produced. Effective arguments pro and con are being offered for each of these five elements as concerns carpal tunnel syndrome.

Author: Owen, Ronald D.
Publisher: Elsevier Science Publishers
Publication Name: Journal of Products Liability
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0363-0404
Year: 1992
Laws, regulations and rules, Carpal tunnel syndrome

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Analysis, Product liability, Products liability
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: What corporate social responsibility means to me. The education of American business
  • Abstracts: Survey of non-ALJ hearing programs in the federal government. Negotiating for knowledge: administrative responses to congressional demands for information
  • Abstracts: Labor-management cooperation: summary of the Electromation Case. Employee involvement groups: the outcry over the NLRB's Electromation decision
  • Abstracts: The dilemma of the large premium case (or not having enough beneficiaries is Crummey). Ascertaining objectives
  • Abstracts: The benefits of charitable remainder trusts. Proper use and abuse of familial limited partnerships. Valuation of buy-sell agreements under chapter 14 of the Internal Revenue Code
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.