Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

No extradition to Hong Kong; real punisher seen as China, which has no U.S. extradition treaty

Article Abstract:

The US has ruled against the extradition of businessman Jerry Lui to Hong Kong, where he is sought on bribery charges. Backed by human rights organizations, Lui claimed his extradition would be illegal as trial and punishment would take place under Chinese, not Hong Kong law, and China does not have an extradition treaty with the US. This is because China will assume control of Hong Kong on July 1, 1997. Lui also claimed he could face execution since bribery can be a capital crime in the People's Republic.

Author: Rovella, David E.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
China, Political aspects, Hong Kong, Extradition, Lui, Jerry

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


$29B - for billion - verdict; the case involves the CIA, the Marcoses and the theft of buried treasure

Article Abstract:

A Hawaii Circuit Court has ruled in Roxas v. Marcos that Roger Roxas's estate deserved restitution for the lost treasure he said before his death former Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos's minions tortured him into revealing the location of. This treasure, which included gold bars, gold bullion, and a 22-carat Buddha was rumored to be the financial basis upon which Marcos governed. Roxas was awarded $22 bil for the loss, $7.4 mil to his estate, and $6 mil for pain and suffering during his captivity.

Author: Rovella, David E., Fisk, Margaret Cronin
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
Claims against decedents' estates, Treasure-trove, Marcos, Ferdinand

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Sex-crime laws given free rein; circuits use high court decision on commitment to bless Megan's laws

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court in 1997 declared the Kansas Sexually Violent Predator Act constitutional, a law permitting the commitment of a mentally ill prisoner likely to commit further sexual crimes. The case offered the court's first implicit approval of Megan's laws, which are based on the same legal foundation. Some prosecutors believe that using civil law for criminal issues in inappropriate, while other critics say the laws will lead to increased litigation.

Author: Rovella, David E.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
Laws, regulations and rules, Sex offenders, Criminal behavior, Prediction of, Insane, Prediction of criminal behavior, Civil commitment, Mentally ill persons, Remedies, Violent crimes, Child sexual abusers

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Mr. Thompson takes on Washington: whether as a lawyer, actor or now U.S. senator, Fred Thompson follows his own script
  • Abstracts: What does woman want? Recognition at last. Progress for women in law - but no parity yet. Is there sexual parity for prisoners?
  • Abstracts: Petitions and priorities. Risk assessment perspectives from the agency view. The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
  • Abstracts: Is there a claim for damages from the rejection of a collective bargaining agreement under Section 1113 of the Bankruptcy Code?
  • Abstracts: Settling the score; good negotiation skills pave the way for better settlements. LSC setbacks offer new opportunities; volunteers and private contributions can help the poor attain equal justice
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.