Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Noncompete clauses face uphill fight; firms test ethics rules in trying to box in ex-partners

Article Abstract:

Noncompete clauses are still common in the partnership agreements of some of the nation's foremost law firms even though most state courts will not enforce such restrictive covenants. Law firms include these clauses to prevent client loss when partners leave the firm. Even most local ethics rules outlaw such covenants, but this has not stopped many firms from including them in their partnership agreements. California is the only state which permits 'reasonable' restrictive covenants in partnership agreements.

Author: Van Duch, Darryl
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
states

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Arbitration pacts may ease employment disputes; a court may refuse to enforce an agreement, however, if a clause impairs the rights of employees

Article Abstract:

Law firms and other employers using employee arbitration agreements to reduce litigation should ensure that the agreements are drawn up carefully and offer similar rights to those enjoyed in court. Otherwise the agreement risks being set aside, as various state courts have done. These courts, however, generally presume in favor of the agreement, and have required employment discrimination claims to be pursued through arbitration rather than lawsuit. Some limits on awards or filing time may be unenforceable.

Author: Drapkin, Larry C., Arbetter, Brian S.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Negotiation, mediation and arbitration, Contracts, Labor arbitration, Labor disputes

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Are noncompete clauses kaput? In an emerging trend, states may follow California's policy favoring open competition

Article Abstract:

The effects of Section 16,600 of California's Business and Professions Code which forbids the enforcement of non-competition agreements and the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act which provides employers with some recourse against trade secret misappropriation are discussed. Steps for employers to use to prevent trade secret misappropriation and to gather evidence of the violation should it occur are given.

Author: Welsh, Robert C., Drapkin, Larry C., Grant, Samantha C.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 2000
California, States, Trade secrets, Protection and preservation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Human resource management, Non-competition agreements, Noncompete agreements, Law firms
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Associate bonuses for firm stars. Growing national by merger. In the Bay Area, making partner bucks the odds; first-years' odds now range from 19% to 4%, causing many to look for other jobs
  • Abstracts: Associate committees give a voice to new lawyers; firms can reap rewards by improving communication with those practicing on front lines
  • Abstracts: End of the unfunded feast; aging partners are forcing firms to face the danger in traditional pension plans. The pause that refreshes
  • Abstracts: A general model for corporate acquisition law. The unfairness of applying lack of marketability discounts to determine fair value in dissenters' rights cases
  • Abstracts: Here we go again: the conversion of qualified scholarship funding corporations from nonprofit to for-profit status; what we can learn from the heath care conversion bonanza
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.