Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Second Circuit holds fraud actionable in employment agreements

Article Abstract:

The US Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit held in Stewart v. Jackson-Nash that an employer can be liable for fraud for misrepresentations about prospective employment. The case concerned an attorney who changed law firms on the representation that the second firm intended to expand in her specialty of environmental law and that she would head this department. The court found the law firm's claims to be fraudulent because they represented present fact rather than promises about the future and also ruled that oral representations relied upon to the plaintiff's detriment were actionable in fraud.

Author: Bass, Stuart L.
Publisher: Commerce Clearing House, Inc.
Publication Name: Labor Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0023-6586
Year: 1993
Fraud, Law firms

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The expanding role of arbitration and judicial concern: a need to redefine ground rules

Article Abstract:

Arbitration and other types of alternative dispute resolution are being used more extensively because of the high cost and time involved in litigation. This use is encouraged, but there is a need to set ground rules so that arbitration agreements are enforceable. The agreement to arbitrate a dispute should be simple and understandable to the parties, and clear procedural rules should be set forth. Employees should be able to choose their own representatives. Experts in industry and business should be available to help resolve the disputes.

Author: Bass, Stuart L.
Publisher: Commerce Clearing House, Inc.
Publication Name: Labor Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0023-6586
Year: 1995
United States, Management, Dispute resolution (Law), Labor arbitration

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The "reasonable woman" standard: the Ninth Circuit decrees sexes perceive differently

Article Abstract:

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Ellison v Brady posited a 'reasonable woman' standard for judging claims of sexual harassment. The court held that only the victim's perspective can judge the severity of sexual harassment and that this requires taking into account the different perspectives of men and women. Courts must acknowledge that sexual harassment's roots lie in the imbalances of power between the sexes. Remedies should be severe enough to end the harassment although this does not always mean dismissal.

Author: Bass, Stuart L.
Publisher: Commerce Clearing House, Inc.
Publication Name: Labor Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0023-6586
Year: 1992
Sexual harassment, Employment discrimination, Reasonable man doctrine, Reasonable person standard

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Analysis
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: From Gardner to Circuit City: mandatory arbitration of statutory employment disputes continues. Top ten developments in arbitration in the 1990s
  • Abstracts: IRS issues major secular trust rulings on employer grantor trust arrangements. IRS issues more secular trust rulings
  • Abstracts: Seeking a cure; election-year debate on health care has partisan overtones. Ringing out the 103rd; a partisan Congress closes with substantial list of measures passed
  • Abstracts: Supreme Court holds legal and investment banking fees of target of friendly takeover nondeductible. Spin-off of newly formed subsidiary results in recapture of ITC
  • Abstracts: Editing didn't turn article into something completely different. The 'little engine that could' has turnaround, gets respect
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.