Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

A well-planned attack; preparing cross-exam ahead of time gives it more impact

Article Abstract:

Issues regarding the need for a coordinated plan for cross-examination are argued. Trial lawyers should only choose strong points that support a coherent plan they have worked out before coming to court. Ground rules include filling in the remaining blanks with cross-examination, attacking the witness, and using the witness constructively to prove part of the case.

Author: McElhaney, James W.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 2000
Planning, Cross-examination, Examination of witnesses, Cross examination, Witness examination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Strategy for dragonslayers; start from within to cure lurking ills of the legal profession

Article Abstract:

The pit bull attitude some attorneys have developed may have much to do with public disrespect for lawyers and the legal system. The mean streak usually dormant in everyone's personality is starting to inch its way to the front of lawyers' personalities, and the whole country has to be more civil again. Respect has to be earned, too, and voluntarism is one way to earn it.

Author: McElhaney, James W.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1997
Attorneys, Offices of Lawyers, Standards, Lawyers, Public opinion, Legal etiquette

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The jury consultant bazaar; know what you're buying in the litigation support market

Article Abstract:

Specialists who can help with jury selection have names ranging from jury research consultants, jury selection consultants, to jury profilers. The actual trial can be tested as well, with people from the actual community, or something similar to it. Shadow juries hear what the real juries hear, at the same time they hear it. The difference is their daily feedback to a shadow jury coordinator, telling how they felt about the merits of a case and what they failed to understand.

Author: McElhaney, James W.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1998
Management, Appointments, resignations and dismissals, Jury selection, Legal consultants

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Nipping youth crime in the bud; lawyers help steer truants to the right side of the law through bar projects. Cops in the cross fire
  • Abstracts: State court approval results in estate tax exclusion of incompetent's gifts. Making estate planning fun (again?)
  • Abstracts: Legal aid lawyers roll dice with new lawsuit; LSC officials fear angry congressional reaction. Defeating Goliath; how Wen Ho Lee's lawyers took the DOJ to the woodshed
  • Abstracts: United they sit; last term suggests 5-4 splits likely in areas of federalism, civil rights, religion. States rights gamble: tribal casino gambling triggers federalism issues for Supreme Court
  • Abstracts: Detoured to ADR; a new round of employment issues is coming to court as companies look to refine the wording of workers' contracts
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.