The cross-exam minefield; recognize the traps, then step lightly to avoid them

Article Abstract:

Pointers for conducting effective cross-examinations and for traps to avoid are given. The rules include short questions with simple words, always asking for the facts, and no questions the attorney does not know the answer to or which does not matter.

---

Talking back to Billy Pidcoe; cross-examinations help you tell the story of the case

Article Abstract:

Guidelines for the use of cross-examination are given and paramount is telling your case's story so that the judge and jury understand it the first time. Facts and insights essential to an understanding of the case should never be held back until the final argument.

---

Fault lines; your mistakes can make the other side look good

Article Abstract:

The management of cross examination is discussed. A claims check, a background investigation are necessary before accepting a client, and the judge should also be checked. All documents should be reviewed before depositions.

Similar abstracts:

• Abstracts: Switch-hitters saving the day; two corporations looking to settle lawsuits hire plaintiffs lawyers. Putting the squeeze on juries
• Abstracts: Nipping youth crime in the bud; lawyers help steer truants to the right side of the law through bar projects. Cops in the cross fire
• Abstracts: Pulling the plug on executions; ABA's call for death penalty moratorium sparks debate in Congress. Pocketbook pitch
• Abstracts: 'What's it to you?' Scalia's 'rude question' may help to clear the air in his campaign to curb citizen environmental suits
• Abstracts: Standing up to cybersquatters; judges are seizing on new legislation to keep Web site pirates from takiing a name for themselves

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.