Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Taxing civil court awards

Article Abstract:

More judges and courtrooms are needed to handle the flow of civil litigation, but there is little prospect that the necessary resources will be allocated under the current system. With the average tort case resulting in a $25,000-$30,000 award and a cost to the community of $550, it seems plausible that a small tax assessed on award amounts could be used for court finance. Also, if communities were made aware of the economic benefits of civil litigation, they might allocate more resources to the courts.

Author: Speiser, Stuart M.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
Taxation, Finance, Reports, Prevention, Damages, Damages (Law), Court congestion and delay, Court delay, Institute for Civil Justice, Court administration

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Scientific law of unintended consequences

Article Abstract:

The 1993 Supreme Court decision of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals established principles for the admission of expert scientific evidence. These included the derivation of the opinion evidence from litigation, its publication or, if published, its peer review, and whether there is an objective source who can attest to the acceptability of the methods used by at least a recognized minority of the scientific community.

Author: Silberfeld, Roman M.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1998
United States, Drugs, Product liability, Products liability

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Peer panels can stomp out truth

Article Abstract:

The Bush Administration Council on Competitiveness' attempt to limit expert evidence to widely accepted theories and to change Federal Rule of Evidence 702 accordingly was misguided. Scientific history shows that the scientific establishment has traditionally rejected new theories when they first came out, and that many of these theories later became established scientific doctrine.

Author: Speiser, Stuart M.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1993
Peer review

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Evidence, Expert, Expert evidence, Evidence, Scientific, Scientific evidence (Law)
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Takings, exclusivity and speech: the legacy of PruneYard v. Robins. Property, speech, and the politics of distrust
  • Abstracts: New-value exception: still viable? Courts divided. Landlords may be left out in the cold. Bankruptcy flaws now minimized; the troubling real estate implications of the code, raised, for example, by the Deprizio rule, have been modified by new legislation
  • Abstracts: Labor Department issues final rule on participant-directed investments. DOL issues class exemption on issues raised by Harris Trust
  • Abstracts: Lawyer liable for coerced sex; jury awards ex-client $225,000 for malpractice despite competent representation
  • Abstracts: After Adarand. GM cover-up charged in truck case; company to probe claim that lawyers shredded fuel-tank safety files
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.