Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The Del. Court of Chancery rules on a board's duty to monitor employees; the Legislature amends the state's business laws

Article Abstract:

The Delaware Legislature made a number of minor revisions to the corporation law in 1996, and the Delaware Court of Chancery heard a case that interpreted the 1963 Graham decision duty to monitor. In In re Caremark International Inc. Derivative Litigation, the Chancellor found that directors must ensure that adequate reporting and monitoring systems were in place to promote awareness of employee activities that could trigger liability. The Legislature is making duplicate record-keeping unnecessary, changing committee appointment procedures and requiring articles of incorporation amendment for forward and reverse stock split.

Author: Welch, Edward P., Turezyn, Andrew J.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
Interpretation and construction, Corporate directors, Corporation law, Fiduciary duties

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Courts rethink approaches to appraisal

Article Abstract:

The discounted cash flow (DCF) approach to appraisal was favored over the comparable-company approach or the Delaware block approach by the Delaware Court of Chancery in the case of In re Radiology Association Inc Litigation, decided in Nov 1991. Appraisal is a remedy designed to resolve disputes concerning the fair value of stock taken in mergers or other forced transactions. Prior to 1983 the Delaware block was the only method used, but most recent decisions have favored DCF analysis.

Author: Welch, Edward P., Turezyn, Andrew J.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
Cases, Corporations, Valuation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Two important rulings from the Delaware Court of Chancery concern stock option plans and stock issuances to directors

Article Abstract:

Judicial review of interested directors was undertaken by the Delaware Court of Chancery. Insufficient notice for an annual meeting coupled with the inapplicability of the business judgement rules, together added up to enough evidence to allow the Delaware Court of Chancery to set aside an election at the shareholders' meeting. The importance of safeguarding the fairness at meetings wherein stock option plans and director compensation are discussed cannot be overemphasized.

Author: Welch, Edward P., Turezyn, Andrew J.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Carriers, Pension, health, and welfare funds, Pension Funds, Surety insurance, Directors & Officers Liability Insur, Stock Ownership Plans, Options (Finance), Stock options, Directors' and officers' liability insurance, Employee stock ownership plans

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Delaware
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The remarkable - and irrational - disparity between the patent term and the copyright term. The nature of the intellectual property clause: a study in historical perspective
  • Abstracts: Workplace bias to the fore: Court to rule on factoring race into employment decisions. Back to work; job bias is at issue in three cases on the Court's expanded docket
  • Abstracts: Taking a firm hand in discipline; New York ethics rules pinpoint law firms - some say more states should follow
  • Abstracts: Are vertical restraints pro- or anticompetitive? Lessons from Interstate Circuit. Workers' compensation rate regulation: how price controls increase costs
  • Abstracts: Retirement planning and the cost of long-term care: battling the fear of the unknown. Employee benefits and the retirement decision
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.