Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The acquisition of reconstructed tax loss companies and trusts

Article Abstract:

Review of the tax treatment of loss companies restructured under various forms of insolvency reorganization indicates that the anti-trafficking rules may be applied overbroadly by the Australian Taxation Office. The denial of loss deduction usage to all trusts that demonstrate a change in majority beneficial ownership is unfair and will discourage insolvent corporate trustee reconstruction. Deed of company arrangements and scheme of arrangement reconstructions in the context of liquidation, receivership, administration and other insolvency proceedings are reviewed.

Author: Shtein, Oliver
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1995
Taxation, Corporate reorganizations, Bankruptcy reorganizations, Bankruptcy reorganization

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The loss of another tax loophole

Article Abstract:

The Australian Treasurer has eliminated a loophole that allowed formerly bankrupt taxpayers to deduct losses arising from debts that were resolved during the bankruptcy. The rule ends a double benefit situation where the taxpayer is protected from the debt and yet still benefits from the loss deductions. Cases where the bankruptcy ruling was annulled are still limited by the rule because otherwise taxpayers could benefit from arrangements made during the bankruptcy which was later removed.

Author: Walpole, Michael
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1995
Interpretation and construction, Bankruptcy law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Damages for breach of the employer's implied duty of trusts and confidence

Article Abstract:

The 1909 House of Lords decision in Addis v. Gramophone Co. is a barrier to employees wrongfully dismissed seeking to recovery damages in both the UK and Australia. The House of Lord confirmed this in their 1997 decision of Malik v. Bank of Credit & Commerce International. The issue of necessity, however, differs in the UK from Australia, and the courts should consider if the Addis barrier might be overcome.

Author: McCarry, Greg
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1998
United Kingdom, Employer liability, Remedies, Employee dismissals, Employment terminations, Employment at will, Breach of trust, Necessity (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Australia, Laws, regulations and rules, Loss deductions
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The construct of psychopathy. Restoration in youth justice. Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law
  • Abstracts: The arbitration of discrimination claims in employment cases
  • Abstracts: The effect of broad patent scope on the competitiveness of United States industry. part 2 Delaware's new mandate in class action settlements: expanding the scope and intensity of settlement review
  • Abstracts: International convergence of antitrust laws and enforcement. Antitrust expert helped sink Breyer's nomination to the Supreme Court: an interview
  • Abstracts: Derivative actions by policyholders on behalf of mutual insurance companies. Two cases interpret the Americans with Disabilities Act
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.