Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The debate over mandatory arbitration in employment disputes

Article Abstract:

The Supreme Court, in Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp. in 1991, ruled that agreements between employers and employees mandating the arbitration of statutory employment discrimination claims are enforceable. The Court thus reconciled two conflicting lines of cases and rejected the view that adjudication is preferable to arbitration for settling claims of discrimination. A review of the pros and cons on mandatory agreements shows that the federal policy of encouraging labor arbitration should not be undermined.

Author: Fitz, Andrea
Publisher: American Arbitration Association
Publication Name: Dispute Resolution Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 1074-8105
Year: 1999
United States, Employment discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Drug testing at a labor arbitration: friend or foe?

Article Abstract:

Drug testing had no effect on the outcomes of labor arbitration in a survey of 200 relevant cases. It did, however, complicate the arbitration from the perspective of management by raising more potential problems at the hearing, involving such issues as chain of custody and impairment within the just cause framework. The presence of drug testing may, however, result in only weaker cases going to arbitration, or in giving management a false sense of security.

Author: Crow, Stephen M., Fok, Lillian Y.
Publisher: American Arbitration Association
Publication Name: Dispute Resolution Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 1074-8105
Year: 1995
Mandatory drug testing, Drug testing

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Arbitration in public sector labor disputes

Article Abstract:

The author discusses the New York Court of Appeals decisions in Watertown City School District v. Watertown Education Ass'n and Indian River Central School District v. Passino, in which the court permitted arbitrators to handle public sector labor disputes, reversing years of judicial control over such disputes.

Author: Gaba, Richard M.
Publisher: American Arbitration Association
Publication Name: Dispute Resolution Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 1074-8105
Year: 2001
New York, Public employees, Government employees

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Negotiation, mediation and arbitration, Labor arbitration
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Election campaign propaganda: Board policy then and now. Arbitrating employee intellectual property disputes. Weingarten through the looking glass
  • Abstracts: The next terminator. Humming in perfect time. A season of change
  • Abstracts: Chromalloy: United States law and international arbitration at the crossroads. Achieving restitution: the potential unjust enrichment claims of indigenous peoples against multinational corporations
  • Abstracts: The Nile River: potential for conflict and cooperation in the face of water degradation. Institutions and conjunctive water management among three Western states
  • Abstracts: Sex wars redux: agency and coercion in feminist legal theory. Theorizing yes: an essay on feminism, law, and desire
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.