Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The invisible barbecue

Article Abstract:

The political assumptions underlying the negotiation and passage of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 have been largely unquestioned by the press and the academy, despite the fact that the circumstances bear striking resemblance to deals struck by the robber barons of the 1860s and 1870s. The language used to promote telecommunications reform, including the phrases "information superhighway" and "market for eyeballs," has skewed the debate. Self-interested advocates of the Act have attempted to reinforce the authority of broadcasters and the public's role as passive consumers.

Author: Moglen, Ellen
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1997
Internet, Political aspects, Terminology

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The new video competition: dances with regulators

Article Abstract:

Open video services (OVS) provisions in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and accompanying FCC regulations will do little to improve competition in local television markets because the regulations serve to erect barriers to entry. The OVS provisions are part of an effort to promote competition by lifting the ban on video services provision by local telephone companies. Despite claims that competition will be promoted, the level of regulation imposed on local video markets continues to be so extensive that incumbents will necessarily be favored over new entrants.

Author: Robinson, Glen O.
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1997
Cable television, Broadband transmission, Broadband

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Physical scarcity, rent seeking, and the First Amendment

Article Abstract:

The physical scarcity doctrine cannot withstand economic and technological scrutiny and should not be used to justify regulation that encroaches on First Amendment rights. Scarcity and the broadcast licensing schemes it has justified serve the rent-seeking interests of dominant broadcasters and politicians. This alliance of government and big business to restrict the access of others to media is just the type of control that the First Amendment was intended to condemn.

Author: Hazlett, Thomas W.
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1997
Economic aspects, Freedom of speech

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Telecommunications, Telecommunication, Broadcasting policy
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Mispriced planet. The beneficiaries of Clean Air Act regulation. Mobile source pollution in Mexico City and market-based alternatives
  • Abstracts: The Working Time Directive. The Working Time Regulations 1998. Injunction to restrain dismissal in breach of redundancy selection procedure
  • Abstracts: Executive compensation: today's techniques. Equity based compensation plan for directors. Background information on typical compensation components
  • Abstracts: Transitional losses: criteria for compensation. Trends in youth smoking: is there really a crisis? Banks, insurance companies, and mergers
  • Abstracts: The 35 USC 102(e) date of a continuation of an international application (part 2). To promote the progress of useful arts: American patent law and administration, 1787-1836
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.