Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The role of a bill of rights

Article Abstract:

Many controversies over interpretation arise out of different conceptions of the Bill of Rights. It may be seen as a code, a structural corrective for problems of representative government or a charter of individual rights. If these conceptions are used without first being justified, certain fallacies result. These include demanding textual support, believing that all provisions should be considered equally, ignoring issues of judicial competence, attributing equal moral force to every provision and denying judicial authority to decide moral issues.

Author: Strauss, David A.
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1992

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Originalism and interpretive conventions

Article Abstract:

The interpretive methods that existed at the time that the US Constitution was written are considered. The way in which these methods affect the argument that the Constitution ought to be interpreted by determining the "original intent" of its constructors is examined. Evidence does seem to point to the supposition that the founders expected that the meaning of the Constitution would become "fixed", but this does not mean that originalists will cease having to explain unresolved issues.

Author: Nelson, Caleb
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 2003
Legal issues & crime, Government regulation (cont), Government regulation, Legal/Government Regulation, Methods, Laws, regulations and rules, Constitutional history, Original intent (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The true wisdom of the Bill of Rights

Article Abstract:

The rights protected by the Bill of Rights require interpretation because they are not fixed. The important factor in constitutional interpretation is continuity rather than identity of rights. The essential freedom protected is the freedom to differ, and the protection is from government interference rather than from the actions of other individuals. However, the Constitution should be seen more as a set of responses to practical issues than as the embodiment of a unified theory.

Author: Kurland, Philip B.
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1992
Beliefs, opinions and attitudes

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Analysis, Interpretation and construction, Constitutional law, Constitutional interpretation, Civil rights
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The price of doing business: environmental criminal fines and the administrative expense solution. The administrative relationship between the district and bankruptcy courts
  • Abstracts: History lean: the reconciliation of private property and representative government. Rights and 'Rights Talk.' (review essay on 'Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse)
  • Abstracts: The taxation of retirees under retiree health premium arrangements. Congress extends expiring tax provisions
  • Abstracts: Cure for a system in chaos. Jury system ain't broke, so leave it. The U.S. jury system is failing
  • Abstracts: The general duty clause of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. Recent developments in OSHA litigation
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.