Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The taxation of retirees under retiree health premium arrangements

Article Abstract:

Retiree health premium plans provide employers with the opportunity to place a cap on the health benefits provided to retired employees, but certain steps must be taken to ensure that these benefits remain tax-exempt to the employee. Contributions are made to the plan to provide retirees with funds to spend on medical needs. The plan must be designed so that only accidents and medical needs are covered. The premium plan must also meet flexible spending account rules and satisfy non-discrimination testing. The plan may also operate by reimbursing the retiree for premiums paid by the retiree.

Author: Bauserman, Judy C., Conaway, Harry J.
Publisher: Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
Publication Name: Tax Management Compensation Planning Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-8607
Year: 1996
Health aspects, United States, Insurance, Retirees, Defined contribution plans

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Congress extends expiring tax provisions

Article Abstract:

Congress extended several expiring tax provisions that affect employee benefits through Jun 30, 1992. Included in the extensions are employer-provided educational assistance exclusions, self-employed health insurance deductions and group legal services exclusions. The cost of the extensions is to be covered by changes in the estimated tax payment rules for corporations. Congress promised this will be the last extension and any provisions that are deemed necessary will be made permanent.

Publisher: Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
Publication Name: Tax Management Compensation Planning Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-8607
Year: 1992
Compensation and benefits, Corporate taxes, Self-employed persons, Self employed persons, Corporations, Employer-supported education, Employer supported education

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Payment under stock option plan not an excludable amount received under an accident or health plan

Article Abstract:

The Tax Court held in Fisher v Commissioner that payments received by participating in an employer's restricted stock plan could not be excluded from income under the guise of monies received from a health or accident plan. The court agreed that plans can be dual-purpose, but found that the stock option plan in this case had no characteristics indicating employer intent for it to double as an accident or health plan.

Publisher: Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
Publication Name: Tax Management Compensation Planning Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-8607
Year: 1992
Cases, Tax exclusion, Employee stock options

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Taxation, Health insurance
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Ethical abuse of technicalities: a comparison of prospective and retrospective legal ethics. Cyber-race
  • Abstracts: History lean: the reconciliation of private property and representative government. Rights and 'Rights Talk.' (review essay on 'Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse)
  • Abstracts: The next unionism: structural innovations for a revitalized labor movement. The Staggers Act: changes in pay, productivity, and unionism for regional railroads
  • Abstracts: "The most fun they've ever had": lawyers in the world of pro sports. Olympic lawyers behind the scenes; let the games begin
  • Abstracts: Why are they picking on us? No: a pat thesis. Three little words; the nature of the judicial process revisited
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.