Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The role of firm-specific capital in vertical mergers

Article Abstract:

Firm specific capital (FSC) motivates the vertical mergers of businesses. FSC exists when two firms have a relation which is more valuable than they would have with other firms doing the same business transactions. Analysis of residual stock returns shows a correlation with FSC before mergers if the FSC is already in use rather than used after the merger. Samples for analysis included 18 daily cases from 1963 to 1977 and 11 monthly cases from 1953 to 1963.

Author: Weiss, Avi
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: Journal of Law and Economics
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0022-2186
Year: 1992
Acquisitions and mergers, Capital

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Another look at Alcoa: raising rivals' costs does not improve the view

Article Abstract:

The antitrust analysis method that focuses on raising rivals' costs (RRC) is inadequate, as shown by its application to United States v Aluminum Co of America. In fact, the case still stands as an example of an unjust antitrust conviction. Alcoa was found guilty of monopoly in 1945 because it had a large market share. RRC theorists analyzed the case as applicable to bauxite and electricity supply, but Alcoa's position refutes such claims.

Author: Lopatka, John E., Godek, Paul E.
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: Journal of Law and Economics
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0022-2186
Year: 1992

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Foreclosure of railroad markets: a test of Chicago leverage theory

Article Abstract:

The Chicago leverage theory of vertical integration and monopolies does not universally hold, as shown by an analysis of railroad markets. The theory claims that a monopoly will prevent effective competition in any other part of a vertical chain, thus inhibiting vertical foreclosure. However, the railroads have competitive benefits even in restricted markets, and policy should foster competition instead of regulation.

Author: Grimm, Curtis M., Winston, Clifford, Evans, Carol A.
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: Journal of Law and Economics
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0022-2186
Year: 1992
Railroads, Criticism and interpretation, Chicago school of economics, Monetarism

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Economic aspects, Vertical integration, Antitrust law
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: International trafficking in stolen vehicles. What recent studies do (and don't) tell us about imprisonment and crime
  • Abstracts: The use of open terms in contract. The great transformation of regulated industries law
  • Abstracts: The employment regulation of Americans abroad and in foreign owned businesses in the U.S
  • Abstracts: Celebrities gain in battle with advertisers. Look-alikes need close scrutiny; using celebrity doubles creates legal risks
  • Abstracts: The employment regulation of Americans abroad and in foreign owned businesses in the U.S. part 2 Federal and New Jersey state fair employment laws
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.