Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The view from the Summit: jurisdiction and beyond

Article Abstract:

Summit Health Ltd v Pinhas is the latest in a string of cases deliberating the extent of federal jurisdiction on interstate commerce pursuant to the Sherman Act. Congress can constitutionally regulate local activities which impact interstate commerce. The issue in the Summit case was whether allegations that there was a conspiracy to exclude Dr. Pinhas from the practice of ophthalmology in Los Angeles met the interstate commerce test of antitrust jurisdiction. The judges felt that the test was passed.

Author: Busey, Roxane C., Freeman, Peter B.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Antitrust Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6056
Year: 1991
Federal jurisdiction

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


60 minutes with Robert M. Langer, chair, National Association of Attorneys General Multistate Antitrust Task Force

Article Abstract:

The activities of the states during the 1991-1992 year have reaffirmed their importance in antitrust enforcement. The mutually dependent projects between the states and the federal government include cross-designation, information-sharing, joint investigations, amicus curiae support services and coordinated litigation. Various highlights of state enforcement in 1991 and 1992 are given.

Author: Briggs, John D., Silberman, Alan H., Denger, Michael L.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Antitrust Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6056
Year: 1992
Unfair competition (Commerce), Unfair competition, Speeches, lectures and essays, Langer, Robert M.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Federal Trade Commission horizontal restraint cases: an economic perspective

Article Abstract:

The FTC's cases from 1980 to 1992 involving horizontal restraint are reviewed, showing reliance on three economic theories. About three-fourths of the 81 cases are based upon theories of raising rivals' costs or one's own costs. The remainder are based upon the theory of traditional collusion. Cases from 1980 on are in the wake of American Medical Assn v FTC.

Author: Langenfeld, James L., Silvia, Louis
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Antitrust Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6056
Year: 1993
Economic aspects

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Antitrust law, Restraint of trade
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The new European convention on international insolvency. American recognition of international insolvency proceedings: deciphering section 304(c)
  • Abstracts: Chromalloy: United States law and international arbitration at the crossroads. Achieving restitution: the potential unjust enrichment claims of indigenous peoples against multinational corporations
  • Abstracts: The powers of Congress and the President in international relations: revisited. International protection of U.S. trademarks: a survey of major international treaties
  • Abstracts: House and Senate version of securities reform legislation, which differ on the safe harbor for predictions and the definition of 'scienter,' must be reconciled
  • Abstracts: Development in the law: international criminal law. Almost private remedy: foreign party suits and the U.S. antitrust laws
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.