Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Third-party beneficiaries

Article Abstract:

Contract law concerning enforceability by third-party beneficiaries suggests the principle that third-party enforcement should be allowed when it furthers the performance objectives of the contract or when supported by independent policy or moral considerations and not conflicting with the contract's performance objectives. This principle is consistent with existing doctrine while offering a more general standard than has yet been determined by courts or by the Restatements of Contract. The principle recognizes third-party beneficiaries as holding a limited power rather than a vested right.

Author: Eisenberg, Melvin Aron
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1992
Analysis, Third parties (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Contract and trust in corporate law: the case of corporate opportunity

Article Abstract:

A Delaware Court of Chancery case, Cellular Information Systems v. Broz, that involved the application of the corporate opportunity doctrine demonstrates the tension between trust law and contract law in corporate law. The case involved a business opportunity brought to an outside director by a third party. Trust principles that impose a duty of loyalty to the corporation might require the director to never confer with other businesses. Contract law alone does not contemplate such balancing of interests when determining the expectations of the parties involved.

Author: Epstein, Richard A.
Publisher: Widener University School of Law
Publication Name: Delaware Journal of Corporate Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0364-9490
Year: 1996
United States, Interpretation and construction, Corporation law, Trusts and trustees, Trustees, Trusts (Law), Delaware, Fiduciary duties

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


U.S. commercial law crosses northern border: good faith and fair dealing is a U.S. doctrine that the Canadian legal system now must address

Article Abstract:

Canadian law has only recently begun to consider whether contracts have an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, with the issue stirring much debate. The watershed case in Canada, Gateway Realty v. Arton Holdings, and subsequent cases feature opinions referring to US use but not jurisprudence. The practical elements of such a covenant are the most difficult, and include what constitutes a breach of the covenant, and whether requiring good faith equates to forbidding bad faith.

Author: Chiasson, Edward C.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Canada, Good faith (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Contracts
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The intersection of federal health information privacy and state administrative law: the protection of individual health data and workers' compensation
  • Abstracts: The year in judicial review, 1997-1998. Paradoxes of racial stereotypes, diversity and past discrimination in establishing affirmative action in FCC broadcast licensing
  • Abstracts: Worldwide community takes action on ozone; amendments to the Montreal Protocol lead to new regulations. Proxies, small business lead talks
  • Abstracts: Border crossing; responding to abductions that remove children from their home states. Away from home; children caught in middle by parental moves
  • Abstracts: Using a community foundation to achieve charitable goals. Comparing a charitable remainder trust with an outright sale
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.