Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Under cloud in Oregon, lawyers sue the media; a former prosecutor and a recalled judge have separate defamation claims pending

Article Abstract:

A lawyer and a judge in Oregon have filed suits against two newspapers and a television station alleging malicious and defamatory reporting, and seeking a total of $78 million in damages. Former Clatsop County district attorney Julie A. Leonhardt is suing the Daily Astorian, the Oregonian, and Portland's KPTV after they covered her indictment by a grand jury and subsequent conviction for forgery and misconduct. Former circuit judge Ronald D. Schenck is suing KPTV for characterizing him as incompetent and too easy on sex offenders.

Author: Slind-Flor, Victoria
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Cases, Libel and slander, Judicial ethics, Media coverage, Oregon, Public prosecutors, Legal ethics

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Weinberger prosecutor choice is criticized

Article Abstract:

Attorney James J. Brosnahan has been appointed special prosecutor to the team prosecuting former Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger of perjury, obstruction of justice and making false statements in the course of the investigation into the Iran-Contra affair. Brosnahan's liberal background including his testimony against William H. Rehnquist in the Senate Judiciary Committee and his defense of Central American refugees has led to charges that he will lack the objectivity necessary to the office of special prosecutor.

Author: Slind-Flor, Victoria
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
Investigations, Appointments, resignations and dismissals, Iran-Contra Affair, 1985-1990, Special prosecutors, Weinberger, Caspar W., Brosnahan, James J.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Calif. Bar criticized by judges; at convention, they decry lack of support

Article Abstract:

Bills reducing court funding did not pass the California Legislature, but the California Judges Assn is offended at the lack of support from the bar association during the fight over court funding. The legislature had called for a 38% cut in the Supreme Court's budget, lower judicial pensions, and $100 million less trial court funding. Chief Justice Malcolm Lucas charged the legislature with an attempt to take fiscal revenge on the courts.

Author: Slind-Flor, Victoria
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
Laws, regulations and rules, Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, California, California. State Bar of California, California Judges Association

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Judges
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Clinton has new nemesis; bar prosecutor's case for disbarment has worrisome strength. Lawyers are hot property; demand is high for the eager and techie
  • Abstracts: Playing by the same rules; measure confirms that federal prosecutors are not immune to state professional conduct regulations
  • Abstracts: Help for impaired lawyers; Commission hopes ABA-sanctioned model will spur nationwide aid programs. Surviving life's trials; how to cope when working for extended periods far from family
  • Abstracts: Director behavior, shareholder protection, and corporate legal compliance. Fiduciary duties and disclosure obligations: resolving questrions after Malone v. Brincat
  • Abstracts: Testing for the effects of concealed weapons laws: specification errors and robustness. Privately produced general deterrence
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.