About "about" and other imprecise claim terms

Article Abstract:

Proper use of terms that are imprecise and yet satisfy the definiteness requirement for patent claims can be an effective way to broaden the scope of a claim. Indefinite terms such as "about," "approximately" and "substantially" have been accepted by US courts and can provide uncertainty that makes designing around a patent more difficult. Indefinite terms must only be used when the outer boundaries are actually uncertain and must be used consistently throughout the application process.

---

Law note: In re Lowry and printed matter

Article Abstract:

Analogies to DNA patents are not a sufficient basis for arguing that software on computer disks should not be denied patents because they contain printed matter. Mathematical algorithms, which have been found unpatentable, are more analogous to software programs. The printed matter restriction has a logical basis, and when printed matter bears some functional relationship to its substrate, patents of the printed matter may be appropriate.

Software, Criticism and interpretation, Intellectual property, Toedt, D.C., III

---

Similar abstracts:

• Abstracts: With Hilton Davis the Federal Circuit takes the doctrine of equivalents back to its roots. Principles of inherency
• Abstracts: Impact of Hatch-Waxman goes beyond generics; the act, designed to facilitate the marketing of generic drugs, may hinder biotech protection
• Abstracts: Courts consistently hold that, despite a special relationship, banks have no duty to disclose customers' check-kiting activities to other banks or to third parties
• Abstracts: Consultation regulations under fire. Definition of "establishment" under Collective Redundancies Directive. Part-timer's redundancy pay claims time-barred
• Abstracts: Staged pay rises for most review body groups. Four in a row at 3.5%

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.