Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Yes: a prime factor

Article Abstract:

Medical malpractice litigation is one of the causes of the rapid rise of health care costs. Juries are not qualified to evaluate the conflicting evidence of opposing experts in complex medical cases. In their fear of litigation, doctors practice defensive medicine, which also adds substantially to medical bills and provides little benefit. Sanctions are arbitrary and many negligent doctors go unpunished. The Domenici bill would have most malpractice cases decided by binding arbitration and place some limits on non-economic damages.

Author: Domenici, Pete V.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1992
Mental distress (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Still warring over medical malpractice; time for something better

Article Abstract:

The controversy between malpractice attorneys, the health care profession and other factions over the contribution of medical malpractice suits to rapidly rising health care costs continues. The health care profession claims that the defensive medicine practiced to ward off malpractice suits is a prime contributor to the rising cost of medical care, while attorneys disagree and state that the malpractice option remains necessary to protect patients from incompetent doctors. Instituting a no-fault system is one suggested reform.

Author: Jost, Kenneth
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1993
Economic aspects, Health care reform

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


No: exploding the myths

Article Abstract:

Changing the system for litigating medical malpractice will not stem the upward trend of medical costs. Data from the National Assn of Insurance Commissioners shows that premiums for malpractice insurance have declined, while other components of medical costs have risen dramatically. Defensive medicine is a good thing if it results in the delivery of more conscientious health care. The American people should expect reasonably priced medical care, but depriving them of access to the courts will not affect rising medical costs.

Author: Falsgraf, William W.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1992

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Remedies, Medical personnel, Malpractice, Medical malpractice
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Lessons learned and recommendations for coping with future scarcity. International Boundary and Water Commission: an institutional mismatch for resolving transboundary water problems
  • Abstracts: History, process, and a role for judges in mediating their own cases. Law and science: the testing of justice
  • Abstracts: Women's imprisonment. Restorative and community justice in the United States. The purposes, practices, and problems of supermax prisons
  • Abstracts: The big push: federal prosecutors pump iron into their campaign against bodybuilding steroids. Legal answers sought on Bosnia
  • Abstracts: Enough, already? Defense attorneys complain about multiple retrials. The revolving door; hiring big political guns can sometimes be a risky proposition
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.