Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Library and information science

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Library and information science

Effects of FCC regulations on television profits

Article Abstract:

The US government, since the start of the television era in 1952, has allowed television stations to profit considerably from unrestricted access to portions of the electromagnetic spectrum. It is estimated that the combined value of profits of owned and operated stations from the period 1959-1980 range between $483 million and $8.5 billion. The Federal Communications Commission, through several regulations, was able to reduce this amount by $1.2 billion, or a third of total potential profits. The application of the Prime Time Access Rule and the prohibition of cigarette advertising are two major regulations that FCC instituted in 1971.

Author: Perloff, Jeffrey M., Ise, Sabrina J.
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Information Economics and Policy
Subject: Library and information science
ISSN: 0167-6245
Year: 1997
Regulation and Administration of Communications, Electric, Gas, and Other Utilities, Regulation, admin. of utilities, Broadcast Regulation, United States. Federal Communications Commission, Influence, Broadcasting regulations, Television stations, Broadcasting policy

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Broadcasting versus narrowcasting

Article Abstract:

Profit and welfare criteria were used to determine characteristics that make programs more likely to be broadcasted than to be aired on pay channels. In terms of market size, a broadcaster tend to produce higher earnings and welfare than a narrowcaster under an extensive market. Advertising also becomes more profitable as the extent of the market increases. On the other hand, the more intensive the market is, the more desirable pay television becomes.

Author: Chae, Suchan, Flores, Daniel
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Information Economics and Policy
Subject: Library and information science
ISSN: 0167-6245
Year: 1998
Cable Television Systems, Cable Networks, Cable and other pay TV services, Cable television broadcasting industry, Cable television, Pay-per-view television

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Mimicking vs. counter-programming strategies for television programs

Article Abstract:

The trade-off between mimicking and counter-programming strategies in the pay and the advertiser-supported television industries is analyzed. The comparison between the market provision and the socially optimum provision of programmes is presented.

Author: Bourreau, Marc
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Information Economics and Policy
Subject: Library and information science
ISSN: 0167-6245
Year: 2003
Forecasts, trends, outlooks, Evaluation, Forecasts and trends, Market trend/market analysis, Subscription television, Pricing policies

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Economic aspects, Television broadcasting industry, Television broadcasting
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The regulation of the Internet encryption technologies: separating the wheat from the chaff. Big brother is at your back door: an examination of the effect of encryption regulation on privacy and crime
  • Abstracts: Profit and audience maximization in broadcasting markets. A simulation analysis of the market effect of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation
  • Abstracts: Effects of the Internet on the spatial structure of innovation networks. My scale or your meter? evaluating methods of measuring the Internet
  • Abstracts: Localized product innovation: the role of proximity in the Lancastrian product space. The digital divide: understanding the economics of new information and communication technology in the global economy
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.