Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Literature/writing

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Literature/writing

Cable 'must carry' rules upheld by high court in 5-4 decision

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court found in Turner v. FCC that must-carry regulations enacted under the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 were constitutional. The Court employed the intermediate scrutiny test for content-neutral restrictions on free speech and found that the burden imposed on cable operators was in proportion to the benefits of maintaining public access to local broadcasting. The dissent believed that the regulations were content-based restrictions and stated that the intermediate scrutiny test was misapplied.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1997
United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Cable television broadcasting industry, Broadcasting policy

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


'Must carry' battle returns to the courts

Article Abstract:

The passage of the Cable Television Consumer Protection Act of 1992 has triggered several cable companies to challenge the law's must carry provisions in court. The cable industry opposes being forced to broadcast local network broadcasters and the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has twice ruled must carry provisions unconstitutional. The new act favors broadcasters, permitting them to choose between negotiating retransmission consent or must carry rights with cable companies.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1993
Cable television

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: Cases, Must carry rules (Broadcasting)
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Civil court access standards strong despite high court inaction. Contempt findings over sealed records reversed
  • Abstracts: The fate of old computers. The X-33 decision, part 1. Palimpsest
  • Abstracts: Public records held by private agencies must be reasonably accessible to public
  • Abstracts: "Can we tape?" A practical guide to taping conversations in the 50 states and D.C. Court allows naming of AIDS-virus carrier
  • Abstracts: Pentagon, journalists agree on most war coverage rules. Pentagon proposes pool membership rules. Pentagon adopts revised media pool rules
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.