Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Literature/writing

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Literature/writing

Courts find newsrack restrictions unlawful

Article Abstract:

Newspapers in Ohio, New York, South Carolina and Pennsylvania successfully fought back against attempts to ban or curtail by expense their use of newsracks. Cincinnati OH and New York City attempted to ban newsracks for commercial publications and courts ruled against them. Airport authorities at the Greenville-Spartanburg SC airport tried to restrict newsracks in terminals, but a court ruled the airport was a public forum and the regulation restricted First Amendment expression. The Philadelphia International PA airport authorities proposed the adoption of expensive newsracks as part of a capital improvement project and have agreed to pay part of the cost.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1992
Economic aspects, Freedom of the press

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Appeals court strikes down newsrack ban

Article Abstract:

The US Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit ruled in Muoltimedia Publishing Co v. Greenville-Spartanburg Airport District that banning newsracks in a South Carolina airport terminal violated First Amendment protection of the distribution of newspapers. The airport terminal was ruled not a public forum, but the court stated that First Amendment protections go beyond such a forum. The court agreed that the airport authority had a legitimate interest in the regulation of newsracks on its property, but a total ban on them was considered an unreasonable regulation.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1993
Services, Freedom of speech, Airports

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


High Court strikes newsrack regulation

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court ruled in Cincinnati v. Discovery Network, Inc that a municipal ordinance forbidding newsracks for the distribution of commercial handbills constituted a restriction of commercial speech. The court stated free speech rights were more important than the city's esthetic reasons for not wanting additional newsracks, and the city had underestimated the commercial speech's value.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1993
Commercial speech doctrine

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Newspaper vending machines, Cases
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Cutting-edge newsroom faces marketplace woes. When numbers talk, journalists help people listen. Newest training efforts reach across newsroom
  • Abstracts: Doing investigations after a hurricane: FEMA funds. Marine deaths: Ugly side of captive-animal facilities surfaces, showing neglect, lack of marine park oversight
  • Abstracts: Outrage claim against newspaper cannot stand: neighborhood resident could not demonstrate any harm from interview with newspaper
  • Abstracts: Court overturns closing of trial, sealing record. Newspaper wins access to parents' trial in juvenile court. Judge's decision to seal transcripts in governor's fraud trial overturned
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.