Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Literature/writing

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Literature/writing

PrimeTime Live's use of hidden cameras, test patients not fraudulent, court finds

Article Abstract:

The US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ruled in Desnick v. American Broadcasting Cos. that the lower court was incorrect to dismiss libel charges based on a news story on the Desnick Eye Centers but was correct to dismiss the fraud, invasion of privacy and other charges. The suit was filed as a result of a "PrimeTime Live" story that claimed the doctors were suggesting cataracts surgery when none was needed for test patients with hidden cameras. The Court would not dismiss the libel charge because it was too earlier in the trial to determine that the statements could not cause damage.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1995
United States, Cases, Surgery, Cataract, Cataract extraction, Investigative reporting, Prime Time Live (Television program)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Missouri Supreme Court opens doors to cameras

Article Abstract:

Missouri has decided to permit cameras in its courtrooms, as part of a two-year experiment in educating the public about the court system. South Carolina is expanding its experimental use of cameras after a six-month test in a county circuit court into its supreme court and court of appeals. Mississippi may open its courts to cameras, pending the outcome of a case which is challenging the state's judicial conduct rule that prohibits judges from allowing cameras to be used. Mississippi, Indiana and South Dakota are the only states that do not permit cameras to be used in courtrooms.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1992
Usage

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


More states OK use of cameras in courtrooms

Article Abstract:

Virginia, South Carolina and Vermont have joined other states in permitting or, at the least, recommending permitting use of cameras in their courtrooms. Virginia has passed legislation allowing cameras in most of their courts permanently after a five-year experiment. South Carolina, after a six-month experiment, has recommended expanding use to more courts. Vermont's study lasted three years and is recommending camera use be permanent.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1992
Statistics

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cameras in the courtroom, Cameras in court
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Housing: officials target minorities in occupancy code raids. Torture: Iraqi athletes report regime's cruelties
  • Abstracts: Rape victim's identity ruled matter of public concern. Indictment over rape report is dismissed
  • Abstracts: The study of science fiction: a modest proposal. Farewell to the master: standing in for Tom Clareson, spring 1993
  • Abstracts: Murder records remain secret after 28 years. Hospitals do not have to disclose internal report on infection rates
  • Abstracts: Fletcher's satire of Caratach in 'Bonduca'. Fortune and virtue in 'The Duchess of Malfi'. Dances with Brecht: Huang Zuolin and his Xieyi theater
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.